Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (21471)	7/31/2012 4:55:30 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	2 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 85487

They have the same legal protections as anybody else. I disagree. As you just pointed out in another post, "marriage" has legal ramifications that only apply heterosexual couples. If the government is going to be in the business of "marriage", then they are obligated to extend it to any adult couple. I do not believe that the solution is to extend marriage to gay couples. I believe that the solution is to cease offering marriage contracts to anybody. Instead, everyone gets a legal partnerships from the government. Marriage happens in the church. Which isn't too far from what we have now. One can get married in church now and still not be legally married