Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the_big_guy who wrote (27104)	8/1/2012 5:28:28 PM
From: PaperProphet	Respond to of 53574

With anyone else, I would have thought that too. But to bounce around, say that he's said it before when he didn't and otherwise be very evasive, then suddenly give a clear "No" when the question is only implied...I don't know. I don't think it's a genuine answer. As I said before, though, I don't think it matters if he's just enthusiastic or whether he has an association with Mr. Bordynuik, other than a passing interest.

To: the_big_guy who wrote (27104)	8/1/2012 5:50:31 PM
From: ohiotom1	Respond to of 53574

for my .02, I just saw a lot of 'dancing around' a direct answer to the direct question.....which, imo, kinda does answers it. lol a 'NO,' floating around on the board, without including in detail as to what the no is in answer to, is as meaningful as a fart in the breeze.......much like most of the claims made by JB and those 'facts' posted in his defense. some, once thought to be credible posters, have lost their creditability just to try to find a way out of a bad investment that they won't admit to. I maybe wrong,,,,but I know 'time will tell'. ajmho tom