Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (139934)	8/1/2012 7:01:37 PM
From: longnshort	7 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224729

I saw the chick fil a poll today.can't wait for the election

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (139934)	8/1/2012 7:07:57 PM
From: jlallen	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224729

Anything with the NY Slimes association and See-BS is automatically suspect....

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (139934)	8/2/2012 10:21:30 AM
From: locogringo	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224729

Read this article before you conclude the recent Quinipiac Poll was biased. Read this article (twice) to understand how stupid you and your party pimps really are. Five Reasons There Are Bad Polls The problem: The poll’s results are preposterous. We know this not because it shows Obama leading but because its “internals” are hilariously out of whack in relation to vote totals in 2008 and 2010. For example: The poll has the president winning among independent voters in Pennsylvania by 22 points, 58-36. 2008 exit polls had Obama winning by about the same margin in Pennsylvania—but in 2010, exit-poll data found Republicans winning the independent vote nationwide by 18 points. Could that have simply swung back all the way to 2008 numbers in Pennsylvania? All but impossible.