SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lokness who wrote (21888)8/3/2012 1:22:12 PM
From: Paul Smith1 Recommendation  Respond to of 85487
 
conservatives want to ignore the tax release issue

Conservatives want Romney and everybody to obey the law. It's not like he's in contempt of Congress like Eric Holder. "Transparency" is a two way street Steve - not just a throw away Obamatron campaign slogan.



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (21888)8/3/2012 1:52:42 PM
From: LLCF  Respond to of 85487
 
<The idea here - now a strategy it seems - is to no longer discuss the original subject but to switch topics in an attempt to ignore the original one.>

Classic wingnut move... Brummar does that all day long too.

DAK



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (21888)8/3/2012 1:54:22 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie6 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Not a one trick pony Murrey, but you can't argue 3 topics at a time. The idea here - now a strategy it seems - is to no longer discuss the original subject but to switch topics in an attempt to ignore the original one. Fast a ferocious has nothing to do with Romney's releasing of his tax returns. What continues to baffle me is why conservatives want to ignore the tax release issue. This one should be a no brainer!

If it's that Romney didn't pay much taxes - then good for him! I always feel better in years I pay fewer taxes. ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with that. But why hide them then?


In the year that Occupy Wall Street was big news and 99% and 1% are actually a part of our vocabulary, it is not a surprise that Romney wouldn't want a bunch of imbeciles going over his tax returns when they have no understanding of what they really say. They are going to see that he paid Warren Buffet style taxes. In other words, he will have paid a smaller percentage on his overall wealth because it is investment income versus wage income. As wharfie said, it's an optics thing. they'll see that he has only paid 15% (or whatever the rate is) and completely ignore that the taxes that he has paid in the past 10 years is probably 100 times what Obama paid.

and he isn't hiding them. The IRS has them. He is being vetted by the IRS. And the fact that you can't see the parallel to Obama hiding his records and sealing the fast n furious records, shows your bias.

If you want any credibility, you should be as passionate about Obama's records and the fast n furious records as you are about Romney's records. But you don't seem to care about the things that might reflect badly on Obama.



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (21888)8/3/2012 1:59:20 PM
From: Murrey Walker1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Fast a ferocious has nothing to do with Romney's releasing of his tax returns.

Fair enough.

If Romney doesn't comply with the disclosure dictated by law of a presidential contender, I'm with you. The man must comply with the rules.

Do you have evidence that he hasn't?

Or do you want to keep doing a "Sancho" with that omni directional windmill of yours?