Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (22580)	8/7/2012 2:59:25 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Respond to of 85487

I was gonna point that out to him but why ? he's gonna vote for obama no matter what. Obama could impale little children on the WH lawn and he would still vote for him, making up some excuse like it's good for gloabl warming

To: Bill who wrote (22580)	8/7/2012 3:20:50 PM
From: Steve Lokness	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 85487

<<<<< Do you think Ann Romney ran up out-of-pocket medical expenses in excess of $1.5 million so she could deduct $50 for her horse?>>> Your argument made me laugh. That's a good one!!! You just don't get it do you? OBVIOUSLY she didn't - wouldn't have - taken a deduction in the 2010 return!!!!!!!!! Because they knew that return was going to be seen by everyone. This isn't rocket science Bill - its common sense easy thinking. ....Might she have in earlier returns? Well, I doubt it, but we just don't know now do we? That's the point!!!! I'm not for a second trying to talk you out of voting for Romney - heck most here will vote for him if he took a deduction for owning slaves - all I'm saying is that to get my vote (and I've said that is not a guarantee) he has to release his returns. Would I like to vote for him? You bet - but that all depends on him.