Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Follies who wrote (93437)	8/13/2012 1:46:31 PM
From: average joe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219732

Evidently the "View from the Center and Left" hostess did not agree with that summation. Message 28331163

To: Follies who wrote (93437)	8/13/2012 1:49:27 PM
From: Joseph Silent	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219732

>>> Mq said "more god like" not that it was god. I realize that you are Mq's chief flag-waving disciple on this board, but even so, you seem to invent material to suit your fancy. If you can find a place in my response where I claimed "Mq said that it was God" can you please point it out? It makes little use to point out your fanciful interpretations because they can only have meaning to you. Likewise, you can define God to be anything you like ...... and people like you frequently do ...... but it really does not mean you have any clue. Unlike you and your boss, I make no claim to know God, and my reference was to religious tradition. I also suspect that the more someone talks about and attempts to define God and Godlike, the further they are from that which they seek to define with small minds. It is sometimes visible in how and what they write.