SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: techisbest who wrote (27566)8/15/2012 10:35:49 AM
From: PaperProphetRespond to of 53574
 
" I see no reason why the components can not be built by multiple fabricators. It must take some time for a fabricator to get up to speed."

Alright, much better insight than Steady_on. Thank you.

Notice Techisbest's constant speculation in order to be able to mentally resolve the data.

Mr. Bordynuik only needs to give vague suggestions to shareholders and they will find the 'best fit' scenario in their minds in order to match the suggestion. If Mr. Bordynuik, for example, told investors exactly what was holding up putting any processor into profitable, commercial operation, it would certainly not be a path nearly as optimistic as the path investors can conjur up in their own imaginations.



To: techisbest who wrote (27566)9/4/2012 7:54:59 PM
From: SteveFRespond to of 53574
 
I would think that any new building required by a site could be built in roughly that same time frame. I'm not sure why the one at N.F. took as long as it did to have the floor poured.

Any idea why they chose a prefab design for the new building that's too small to fit a single P2O processor?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News