Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (23654)	8/17/2012 11:12:47 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

Thanks for admitting you just stupidly made up that stuff about Obama cutting dividends: "Where in the article you posted does it say he gutted dividends for insurance company shareholders" It doesn't in so many words... I expected you to be able to figure out decreased subsidies mean decreased profits which means decreased dividends. I expected too much. Now, what insurance company "subsidies" have been "decreased?" Which insurance companies have seen "decreased profits" and have "cut dividends?" Try to show that you know anything at all about what you're posting about. "while increasing our bennies" In exchange for these kinds of reductions in Medicare spending, funding for the program was bolstered in other ways by the ACA. Preventive care is now covered at 100% for Medicare beneficiaries and a gap in Medicare prescription drug coverage will slowly close under the law. Also, but not in the article, people who were in the donut hole were sent $250 checks last year. Also, annual wellness exams and other preventive/screening services are provided without charge for senior. And do you think cutting medicare spending won't impact any recipients? Or do you think there's a free lunch?