Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (668103)	8/19/2012 5:36:47 AM
From: puborectalis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580483

huffingtonpost.com

To: i-node who wrote (668103)	8/19/2012 11:45:11 AM
From: bentway	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580483

" The question to me is who do we think will be more likely to control the growth in government -- R&R or Obama. Obama makes no real pretense about it -- if he is re-elected he will do everything he can to expand government in every conceivable direction." You need to quit listening to LIARS, Dave: Top spenders? Reagan, then Bush II!

To: i-node who wrote (668103)	8/19/2012 5:31:56 PM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580483

Sure, I believe this guy makes it clear that RRR may do a better job in controlling the growth in government but - would their control just be marginally better, and would that be good enough? Personally I'd rather welcome a change right now and here. Almost anybody would IMHO be better than Bambi/Biden for next 4 years. And, last but not least, perception is everything and a true change (thus time) would no doubt inject some well needed energy into the current lack of trust in the economical course and future of the country. /Taro