SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (24120)8/20/2012 12:19:44 AM
From: gamesmistress2 Recommendations  Respond to of 85487
 
... according to Forbes Magazine, GM is likely headed for bankruptcy all over again. The numbers are stark. The 500,000 shares of GM stock, comprising 26 percent of the company owned by the government–or more accurately the American taxpayer–sold for $20.21 on Tuesday. This left the government holding $10.1 billion worth of stock representing an unrealized loss of $16.4 billion. Even worse, in order to reach the break-even point, the stock would have to sell for around $53 per share.

The numbers remain in flux. As Investors Business Daily reveals, the Treasury Department continues “to revise upward the staggering losses inflicted on U.S. taxpayers.” They further note that the same day GM announced it was recalling 38,000 Impalas used by police in both America and Canada, due to a possible crash risk, a new Treasury report forecast that losses for GM were expected to reach $25 billion, which is $3.3 billion more than predicted earlier. Furthermore, since that report was based on GM’s stock price at the time of the report–15 percent higher than it is currently–those losses are likely understated.

And even those numbers are somewhat misleading. In June, while the media was busy touting GM’s “success,” government purchases of GM vehicles rose a staggering 79 percent. And no doubt by sheer coincidence the purchase occurred only weeks before GM was to announce its 2nd Quarter earnings. GM also got an additional $2.7 billion from the Department of Energy (DOE) to reduce energy consumption in its door-making process. Still more? In a move reminiscent of that which precipitated the housing meltdown, GM has ramped up its uses of risky sub-prime loans to drive vehicle purchases. “The subprime market grew as a result of the recession,” said GM spokesman Jim Cain. “Our experience, however, is that with proper management they are very good risks.” That’s what Democrats like Barney Frank (D-MA) said about the housing market–just before it tanked and took the rest of the economy with it.

rest at frontpagemag.com



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (24120)8/20/2012 12:26:46 AM
From: gamesmistress2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 85487
 
Your historical tangent, while interesting, has nothing to do with the mandate Sandra Fluke et al want: "free" birth control - no copay, no nothing. You would think that given all the sex ed people have had for the last couple of generations that they would be aware of the variety of birth control methods out there and just how readily available many are for a low cost, but apparently not. Maybe we *should* go back to blue cohosh. Grow it in backyards - can't get cheaper than that.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (24120)8/20/2012 12:30:29 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
It seems the ancient Hebrews viewed children as a blessing. The Bible records the Egyptians tried to impose family limiting practices on them, but it was viewed as oppressive. Moses mother went so far as to put her baby in a basket in the river before letting him be killed.

As for the blue cohosh the native Americans used, can you verify the tribe paid the medicine man for that i/o the woman involved?