Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (668245)	8/20/2012 12:40:11 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1584007

>> They are extremely aggressive....which is the adjective I used to describe romney's personal tax shelter practices. You are conflating two unrelated items. I asked for an example of Romney's "aggressive" personal tax shelter practices and you've not provided one. You made the claim and I just wanted to understand what exactly you were referring to. Referring to a shelter used by a corporation on whose BOD Romney sits isn't an example of "aggressive" personal tax shelter practices. >> How the hell does a tax scheme used at marriott 10 years earlier show up in romney's personal tax returns 10 years later? Please.... It doesn't. If Romney had used such a device in the last several years there would surely be evidence of it in his 2010 return. These things rarely happen in one year; there would be remnants flowing through his return for multiple years. This is obviously just something the Obama administration has found that can keep the focus off his record of failure, and they're milking it for all it is worth -- which is the reason they brought it up again last week. Every day spent talking about Romney's tax returns is a day the media doesn't talk about Obama's abysmal record of failure as a president. I'm not sure why libs can't cast aside their political commitment to this man.