SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (668345)8/21/2012 12:42:26 AM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1580699
 
>> ...and it's not OVER.

I don't think Romney's got a chance in hell of winning IL, but if he did, it would be over.

That said, I do think the likelihood of Obama winning is pretty slim at this point. Could be wrong but I don't think so.



To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (668345)8/21/2012 1:00:25 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1580699
 
Making “Chicago” a “code word” for Barack Obama; running against his hometown

August 20th, 2012 By Kevin Collins
coachisright.com

“Code words” is a favorite phrase of the Democrats. When a conservative confronts them with the truth they will often isolate a small portion of what has been said and accuse the speaker of using “code words” so they can obfuscate and hide until the heat dies down. If a conservative says something like, “States have a right to refuse to do something ordered by Barack Obama,” Democrats will take the words “States have a right” and claim they hear “code words” for “States Rights” which is supposed to mean Republicans want to put African Americans back into the chains Democrats kept them in for 250 year until Republicans freed them.

The stupid leap Joe Biden made from Mitt Romney’s desire to “unshackle” business to Republicans wanting to “Put Y’all in chains” proves the point.

Running against Obama’s hometown

Given the fact that Barack Obama is “super glued” to Chicago the “Deadliest Global City” and the central repository for the lowest form of political criminality, it appears that the Romney campaign would do well to begin using the word Chicago as a “code word” in an ever increasing barrage of tv print and radio spots.

Standing 10th of the 22 most favored cities in the country, Chicago isn’t particularly popular. There isn’t a well of good feelings toward the “Windy City” and tying Obama and his idiot running mate “Uncle Joe” to the town can only serve to remind voters that Obama learned his disgusting bottom feeder politics from the masters of political criminality.

Once the connection is solidified in voters’ minds all that the cesspool of the Midwest has to “offer” can be laid at Obama’s feet.

A study by the University of Illinois bestowed the title of “Most corrupt city in America” on Obama’s hometown. The accompanying report stated that the corruption tax, added on to every transaction involving Chicago’s city government, has cost the citizens of the “Windy City” $500 million over recent years.

In the past 35 years there have been over 1530 convictions of Chicago public officials and four of Illinois’s last seven governors were sent to prison.

The charges of police brutality toward Blacks and Hispanics coupled with convictions of crooked cops make Chicago’s law enforcement structure a continual source of embarrassment for the decent people of the city. The ever present gun violence in Chicago is a national embarrassment and it is common for cities in war zones to see fewer people killed during a given weekend.

Tying Obama and Chicago has no downside.

To read more use these links:

1) coachisright.com

2) images.businessweek.com

3) 3) huffingtonpost.com

4) socialistworker.org



To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (668345)8/21/2012 2:48:52 AM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1580699
 
it IS over. You guys can just stay home.



To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (668345)8/21/2012 11:09:18 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1580699
 
Democrats spent $1.5 mil to help Akin win GOP primary
August 20, 2012 | 10:52 am
Sean Higgins

Call it a wise investment in light of his recent comments: Democrats wanted Missouri Republican congressman Todd Akin to win his state’s hotly contested Senate GOP primary because they believed he gave incumbent Senator Claire McCaskill her best shot at retaining her seat. As the Washington Post reported earlier this month:

There’s a reason why Democrats spent over $1.5 million trying to help Akin win his three-way primary. He was the most conservative candidate in the field — and the most unpredictable one. He shook up his campaign staff late last year. He recently released a head-scratching and jumbled campaign ad. And Democrats have already launched a microsite highlighting his controversial statements that won’t play well with moderates. (“America has got the equivalent of the stage III cancer of socialism because the federal government is tampering in all kinds of stuff it has no business tampering in,” Akin once said.)


Here’s how the Democrats did it, running ads in the GOP primary that were intended to boost his appeal among the most conservative primary voters:

The latest example is a new radio ad paid for by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee that attacks Rep. Todd Akin (R), but does so slyly, in a manner that appears to be designed to endear him to conservative voters.

“Todd Akin calls himself the true conservative, but is he too conservative?” asks the narrator of the ad, which is approved by McCaskill’s campaign and paid for by the DSCC. The narrator goes on to note the negative posture Akin has taken toward President Obama, before concluding, “it’s no surprise Todd has been endorsed by the most conservative leaders in our country – Michele Bachmann and Mike Huckabee.”

Bachmann and Huckabee are popular among conservative voters and are from states in the same geographic region as Missouri. If anything, many undecided conservative primary voters who hear their names in the radio ad would be tempted to give him a closer look.


The Post notes that these ad buys were actually more that Akin spent on his own campaign:

According to a Republican strategist tracking ad buys in the race, McCaskill’s campaign and [the Democratic-aligned] Majority PAC have each spent about $850,000 on ads during the last two and a half weeks – more than Akin has spent on commercials during the entire campaign. So if Akin wins the primary, he might be able to credit some very unlikely allies.


While Democrats are now blasting Akin’s comments on “legitimate rape,” one person is resisting calls for Akin to step aside: Claire McCaskill:

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” Monday, where she declined to weigh in on whether GOP Missouri Senate nominee Todd Akin should drop out in the wake of his controversial comments that “legitimate” rape can’t lead to pregnancy.

“It’s not my place to decide,” said McCaskill. “I really think that for the national party to try to come in here and dictate to the Republican primary voters that they’re going to invalidate their decision, that would be pretty radical. I think there could be a backlash for the Republicans if they did that.”


Forgive me for being cynical, but how often does McCaskill worry about the concerns of GOP primary voters? It is something to bear in mind as you read about the growing media frenzy over Akin’s remarks. He got the nomination in large part because the Democrats wanted him to win because they hoped he would say something really stupid. Lucky for them, he obliged. Now that he has, they don’t want him to go away because if he does, so does the controversy he created.

Politics is a cynical business.

washingtonexaminer.com