Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (24279)	8/21/2012 12:40:45 PM
From: gamesmistress	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 85487

Do you even listen to the videos you post? The COMPLETE text of what Romney said is that he would be delighted to sign such a bill if THERE WAS A CONSENSUS SUPPORTING IT IN THIS COUNTRY BUT THAT'S NOT WHERE WE ARE. He also said that he would support overturning Roe v. Wade and RETURNING THE AUTHORITY TO THE STATES. You don't perceive any difference? I do. The debate about abortion and the means to pay for it are ongoing, and Roe vs. Wade did not end it but ensured that it would continue. Daily Kos's view is just as absolutist as Akin's. BTW, the "forcible rape" bill was not "medieval" : in medieval times abortion was (generally) legal but of course dangerous due to the methods used. And we also know a lot more now about the development of the human fetus beyond the "quickening".