SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (26220)11/28/1997 11:52:00 PM
From: Brian Hutcheson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572877
 
Elmer , re. 233mhz as you expected..
Keep on thinking that way Elmer , as an Intel investor I expect you to bury your head in the sand . Have you seen the Ernst, Mcwhinney ad ?
It shows how a Corporation becomes number 1 , then drops the last 3 characters to become numb.
The competition is here to stay and its real , face up to the facts or lose money , Brian



To: Elmer who wrote (26220)11/29/1997 2:44:00 AM
From: Yousef  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572877
 
Elmer,

Re: "This
overheating is exactly what Yousef told us to expect to see."

I have been posting for some time about the disadvatages of using a higher
operating supply voltage to get the 233mhz K6 performance. As mentioned
many times, power will be a lager problem for AMD versus Intel due to the
different supply voltages (Intel .35um process is at lower voltage). This
all stems from the fact that AMD's .35um process is not as agressive with
the FET drive currents and these have not been optimized for lower voltages.
This also will occur with the AMD .25um process based on preliminary
info on operating supply voltages for this new AMD process.

BTW Elmer remember, Brian is not responding to you ... or ... me. I
wonder if as a child, Brian took his ball and went home ... or ... held
his breath to get his way !! Rather childish don't you think ??!!

Make It So,
Yousef