Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Green Oasis Environmental, Inc. (GRNO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (7995)	11/28/1997 10:46:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13091

Ron, please post my e-mail, you'll notice each one was a response to yours, the original e-mail was to me. You requested the RMCW plant photos. I never responded. You e-mailed me again. I responded. Each E-mail since I asked you not to email me again. Each time you disregarded my request. Secondly, RMIL is not even part of my portfolio, its' fun $$. My portfolio is total market, diversified, about 20-30% international except Asia ( at the moment) I dollar cost avg. When researching your thread I found a few posts where you mentioned you & your wife were a little tight on $$, it may have been only one post. But, if you are diversified, great!!! Again, Don't e-mail me anymore, you have my permission to post my e-mail to you, just delete the expletives, I respect Jills' rules here, and do not edit, thats why I never responded to your photo request. You do know that web-site w/ the fradulent photos was found-out don't yoy?, The one you applauded, I have the post# if you need reminding. All GRNO threadsters, help us end this...NOW!!, Pugs

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (7995)	11/28/1997 11:09:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13091

exchange2000.com Can those of you here who E-mailed me please acknowledge to Ron, that he represents your thread and this behavoir is childish, Pugs PS. Ron I've given you much to go on, you've admitted to no DD, you only monologue, you don't dialogue, I'd be happy to talk issues, you said it was a waste of time doing DD on RMIL, I don't agree, how can we debate until you do some DD?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (7995)	11/28/1997 11:37:00 PM
From: Pugs	Respond to of 13091

exchange2000.com I sure hope you can find example of Riley 'hyping' ANY stock, particularly RMIL, any post will do. Riley would never ask anyone to buy. We discuss the co. on its' merit and the short squeeze. Y'know thats' slander, you better hope Rileys' in a good mood. I would think you'd do some DD before you make such a claim. I hope that the GRNO thread isn't represented accurately by Ron, I've rec'd some nice E-mail from some of you concerning Ron and apologize the disruption again. Your critique of the SEC seems hollow after your slanderous attack of Riley. And comparing yourself to him is laughable, Pugs

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (7995)	11/29/1997 1:09:00 AM
From: John Brockman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13091

Ron: What are you doing up so late? Trying to read all 50,000 or so posts on 5 or 6 different RMIL/OVIS/OPLV threads? Give up!! They post two more for every one you read. I've been lurking there for the past couple of months. Some of it is rather entertaining reading. I just think it is strange how trading in GRNO is halted in part due to the large number of posts on the internet yet the Great RMIL/OVIS Hype continues stronger every day. I don't know if there is a line between what is considered to be legal and illegal hyping a stock, but I have read the posts of Riley G when he first came on the old OVIS thread. exchange2000.com In addition to this post, he also posted #'s 221, 225, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 234, 235, 236, 237, 243, 248, up thru 22,000+ on the RMIL thread. He has touted buying 7600 shares at approx 22 cents per share, the stock is being shorted citing #'s of shares to back this up, the stock could go to $20 to $30 a share, and much, much more. This kind of hype seems far more serious and damaging to readers of SI than your newsletter or your posts on the MUCP and GRNO threads. Glad to see you asking the tough questions. I see their response to you similar to the responses DIVER and others got from the GRNO posters prior to May 97. I am reminded of an old phrase, (slightly modified, of course) GIVE 'EM HELL RON!!! Regards John PS: Go to bed....;0)