SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: joseffy who wrote (54690)8/25/2012 4:52:16 PM
From: greatplains_guy1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Tapper, Norah O'Donnell, and Campbell Brown Rebel Against the Media-Collective
by John Nolte
22 Aug 2012

Only because it's my job, I follow hundreds of mainstream media types on Twitter and all day long watch broadcasts of MSNBC and CNN. The fact that this makes me the least informed person in the country is for another post, but what I see reminds me very much of high school. It's hard to quantify, but like The Matrix, as these thousands of tweets stream by throughout the day, you eventually see a pattern and get a sense of how this subculture works.

Just like high school, there's a pecking order in the media -- a cool kids' table, and the requisite desire to be liked, need to be included, and a somewhat nauseating set of rules to it all. Glib, detached irony is a calling card as is an obsession with the fun and games of politics -- because that's all any of this is to them. It's as though taking the future of your country seriously immediately relegates you to the nerd table.

To be fair, though, some things they do take seriously. The RIGHT things, the politically correct things: same-sex marriage, the Congressional Black Caucus -- that kind of stuff. I'm not trying to throw a newsflash your way that the media is leftist, you already knew that, but what's fascinating to watch is the CONFORMITY.

Bottom line: Everything a vast majority of the media does is meant to impress their own. It has nothing to do with getting to the truth or informing the public. They're writing, reporting, and tweeting only to satisfy and aggrandize The Collective -- to continually prove they belong or to improve their standing.

Like I said, it's like high school, and wanting to be part of the cool kids' clique requires conformity – and this conformity isn't exclusive to only left-wing journalists. Media-approved conservatives like Joe Scarborough, David Frum, Peggy Noonan, and the like are just as bad; maybe worse because they should know better.

These unwritten rules and the Borg-like collective conformity that manages the media does, I think, explain at least part of the day-to-day corruption we face. The Narrative is everything -- it's the daily homecoming game where you better show up, look a certain way, speak a certain way, and not spoil the fun. And by "fun" I of course mean the thrashing of conservatives and conservative ideas.

The media does dutifully cover everything, but The Narrative is what drives coverage, the national conversation, and The Agenda. The media might report that unemployment has increased but The Narrative tells us that's a good thing. The media might report that Obama is lying about Romney's record at Bain Capital but The Narrative is entering week seven of demanding Romney release more tax returns.

Obviously, the pressure to fit in isn't felt only among our media overlords. It's a part of any subculture, including conservative ones. But it's not only especially grotesque and artificial in the media; it's dangerous.

The media is supposed to be objective, competitive, and independent. Instead, though, it's the complete opposite -- an organism ruled by conformity, political correctness, and corrupt Narrative leaders like Politico, The Washington Post, The New York Times and whoever finds the latest nonsense-distraction to play whack-a-GOP with -- to keep our eye off the economy. And the finding of this nonsense-distraction is considered The Prize. If you want your stock to climb, if you want a seat closer to the king, tripping up the Republican party is your quickest route (and Ben Smith's reason for living).

Now seems like a good time to get to the point.

Over the past week, we've seen the worst part of the Media-Collective at work: what happens to those who dare, even for a moment, to defy The Narrative.

Over the past years, the failing Newsweek has been a reliably liberal pipe-organ, especially after Tina Brown's takeover. But this week, the weekly dared to run a cover story written by a conservative that makes a damning case against Obama. As you might expect, the blowback from The Collective has been fierce. Politico's Dylan Byers, one of the Media-Collective's top conformity enforcers, has been especially rabid. Suddenly this same so-called media analyst whom we've caught in bed with Media Matters more than once is obsessed with fact checking. Naturally, he's never been this obsessed with tripping up and discrediting any of Newsweek's liberal cover stories.

But this is more than about discrediting or even left-wing bias. It's about enforcement.

Newsweek takes a single step off the Leftist Narrative-Plantation and hell is rained down on them from more places than just Politico. This is the Media-Collective sending a message that this kind of thing just isn’t allowed – a harsh reminder to everyone else that you will pay a heavy price amongst your own every time this happens.

In a nutshell, it's bullying and thuggery -- it's Jimmy Cagney smacking the barkeep around until he agrees to purchase a certain kind of beer.

We saw the same thing happen to Politico reporter David Cantanese, who stepped off the Leftist Narrative-Plantation with a "for argument's sake" defense of Todd Akin's thoughtless and stupid comments about rape and abortion. The sin Cantanese committed wasn't a journalistic one. He wasn't taking a side; he was promoting a discussion that wasn't occurring within The Collective's monolithic coverage. But for doing so, the cool kids trotted him out for public humiliation after a little of the ole' re-education.

Cantanese's only real sin was going off-script and threatening to derail a Distraction-Narrative the corrupt media believes can help them run out the clock for Obama. With 70-odd days to go until the election, if everyone in the media stays in line, Obama's Media Palace Guards know they can milk Akin for at least another week's worth of "Akin exposes a larger problem for the GOP brand" stories (as NBC's Chuck Todd just now said) that distract from the economy.

The news isn’t all bad, though. Not every mainstream media-type is eager or willing to conform. There are some brave souls out there who don’t work in New Media and still retain their credibility. Until a few months ago, off the top of my head, I would've only been able to name ABC's Jake Tapper and CBS's Sharyl Attkisson as exceptions. But recently I've seen some stirrings from two others, and this is most unexpected.

Campbell Brown, a former CNN anchor, has become an op-ed writer and what she's writing about is nothing like her former show. She's been effectively critical of two media sacred cows: Obama and Planned Parenthood, and just this morning was on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" pushing back at the criticism that her being married to a Romney advisor has anything to do with her recent independent streak. Rather than attack me, she basically said, attack my arguments.

Obviously, Brown is getting a taste of the personal attacks the left always launches against apostates.


The most surprising new member of this club, though, might be Norah O'Donnell, who recently moved from MSNBC to CBS as that network's Chief White House Correspondent. Freed from the openly liberal NBC, in recent days O'Donnell has openly bristled (more than once) against the atmosphere of complete and total presidential obedience that emanates from the White House Press Corps. -- Jake Tapper being a notable exception.

Tapper is also a notable exception for having the sand and enough respect for the ideals of his profession to have said this yesterday on Laura Ingraham's radio show:

“We are spending a lot of time in the last few weeks, those of us in the political world, political journalists and also politicians, talking about things other than the economy,” said Tapper. “[A] lot of people are hurting out there. I’d like to see more action taken and more emphasis given to this issue.”

Tapper also said he relates to Mark Halperin’s recent comments about the media. Over the weekend, Halperin said, “I think the press still likes this [Romney tax return] story a lot, the media is very susceptible to doing what the Obama campaign wants, which is to focus on this.”

“I have said before… [that I] thought the media helped tip the scales. I didn’t think the coverage in 2008 was especially fair to either Hilary Clinton or John McCain,” Tapper said.

On the 2008 coverage, he noted, “Sometimes I saw with story selection, magazine covers, photos picked, [the] campaign narrative, that it wasn’t always the fairest coverage.”


I've seen a lot of headlines around Tapper's statements that claim he's accusing the media of "failing the country," but that's putting words in his mouth and reading intent. That's not something I'm going to do.

But I do think that what Tapper said is not only true (obviously) but a very big deal coming from someone as respected and high up as he is. And Tapper's work at ABC News reflects his words. He's covering the big issues.

What we have to hope for is that Tapper's "I'm Spartacus" moment registers with others as much as it did with me and encourages those within the media who thought they were alone to also stand up -- those who respect the ideals of their profession enough to shake off the conformity-shackles of The Narrative and to pursue truth and hold power accountable regardless of party.

Sometimes all it takes is knowing you’re not alone.

Or maybe being on vacation last week made me forget just how hopelessly corrupt this institution is.

Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC

breitbart.com



To: joseffy who wrote (54690)8/27/2012 10:35:01 PM
From: greatplains_guy2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 
Artur Davis’s Conversion
The former Democratic congressman is a threat to his old party.
By John Fund
August 27, 2012 4:00 A.M.

Only about 3 to 5 percent of voters are truly undecided between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. Focus groups run by Republicans have found that some of the most effective ads appealing to those voters feature Democrats and independents speaking candidly about how they voted for Obama in 2008 but are now disappointed.

That’s one of the reasons that Republicans have decided to showcase former Democratic congressman Artur Davis of Alabama as a “headline” speaker at their convention. Davis, a moderate black Democrat who voted against Obamacare in 2010 and was crushed later that year in a Democratic primary for governor, has since left the Democratic party and is backing Mitt Romney. He was an early Obama supporter — the first Democratic congressman outside Illinois to endorse the candidate in 2007. He seconded Obama’s nomination for president at the 2008 Denver convention.

“The Obama I endorsed was the constitutional-law professor who said he supported the rule of law,” Davis explained to me. “Instead, we got someone who always went to the left whenever he reached a fork in the road.” Now Davis spends a great deal of time describing his conversion to Republican audiences. Even Jamelle Bouie, a writer for the left-wing American Prospect who doesn’t find Davis’s conversion story all that compelling, acknowledges its power. “Davis, like Joe Lieberman before him (and Zell Miller before that), can tell a credible story of ideological alienation,” Bouie wrote in the Washington Post. “He thought the Democratic Party was a big tent, but now — under Barack Obama — it is a haven for intolerant leftism.”


Davis himself puts it very simply. He wanted to get beyond race and run as a moderate who would unite people of all kinds behind a reform agenda. “Democrats know that only a moderate can win for their party now in Alabama — the legislature even went GOP in 2010 — but I was a threat to their interest groups. The teachers’ union knew I backed charter schools and they preferred to have a Republican elected rather than a Democrat who might move that party to the center.”

He says he is surprised at the reaction he’s gotten from conservative audiences. “You have a converted sinner who’s standing in front of you right now, and I thank you for letting me stand here,” he told a tea-party group in Falls Church, Va., this summer. “I used to go to the Baptist church in Birmingham, and Baptists are good folks. But they won’t let nobody preach on week one, or month one, like y’all will.”

A major reason Republicans have embraced Davis with such enthusiasm is the manner in which he abandoned liberalism. He wrote an op-ed piece for his hometown newspaper, the Montgomery Advertiser, in October 2011, endorsing a voter-ID law being debated in the Alabama legislature.

Requiring a photo ID in order to vote may be supported by a large majority of Americans — 74 percent in the latest Washington Post poll (including 65 percent of African Americans) — but it has been portrayed by liberal elites as a discriminatory tool designed to suppress black turnout.

One of those voices was Bill Clinton, who in July 2011 excoriated the nationwide movement to pass voter-ID laws as the return of Jim Crow. “There has never been in my lifetime, since we got rid of the poll tax, and all the other Jim Crow burdens on voting, the determined effort to limit the franchise that we see today.”

Davis took his party’s former president on. He wrote: “I was disappointed to see Bill Clinton, a very good president and an even greater ex-president, compare voter ID to Jim Crow, and it is chilling to see the intimidation tactics brought to bear on African-American, Democratic legislators in Rhode Island who had the nerve to support a voter ID law in that very liberal state.”

The former congressman had real credibility in blowing the whistle on this preposterous rhetoric. The two-thirds black district Davis had represented from 2003 to 2011 included Selma, home of the National Voting Rights Museum, and other landmarks of the 1960s struggle for racial equality and voting rights. He had been an active member of the Congressional Black Caucus, and his career had begun with an internship at the Southern Poverty Law Center, an iconic civil-rights group.

So it was startling to read Davis’s mea culpa:

I’ve changed my mind on voter ID laws — I think Alabama did the right thing in passing one — and I wish I had gotten it right when I was in political office. When I was a congressman, I took the path of least resistance on this subject for an African American politician. Without any evidence to back it up, I lapsed into the rhetoric of various partisans and activists who contend that requiring photo identification to vote is a suppression tactic aimed at thwarting black voter participation.

Davis recognized that the “most aggressive” voter suppression in the African-American community “is the wholesale manufacture of ballots, at the polls and absentee, in parts of the Black Belt.” A predominantly black region in Alabama known for its dark, rich soil, the Black Belt comprises some of the poorest counties in the state — and some of the most prone to voter fraud.

“Voting the names of the dead, and the nonexistent, and the too-mentally-impaired to function, cancels out the votes of citizens who are exercising their rights — that’s suppression by any light,” continued Davis in his op-ed. “If you doubt it exists, I don’t; I’ve heard the peddlers of these ballots brag about it, I’ve been asked to provide the funds for it, and I am confident it has changed a few close local election results.”

The reaction to Davis’s column intrigued him. Some people were angry. “I saw it and was frustrated by it,” Representative Emanuel Cleaver, chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, told Roll Call last fall. “I don’t know what that’s all about. There are some people who believe he’s getting ready to switch parties. I have no idea. Needless to say, he doesn’t confide in the CBC.” Davis said he was disappointed that some critics claimed he was speaking out over bitterness that he had lost the Democratic primary for governor. “I gave it my best shot, but they should be concerned that in defeating a moderate like me they handed Republicans every single statewide elected office,” he told me. “But rather than look in the mirror, they prefer to cast stones.”


They are still casting them. Last Thursday, the Democratic National Committee posted a YouTube video showing Artur Davis seconding Obama back at the 2008 convention. The video ends as follows: “The Artur Davis speech at the GOP convention isn’t about Barack Obama. It’s about Artur Davis.”

Davis isn’t concerned. “My old Democratic friends are reminding me of an old rule: In politics, if you fear someone is getting through and people are listening, attack them as fast as you can,” he says.

Davis’s future as a Republican is unclear. He has given thought to running for Congress in northern Virginia, his new home. He also has said he might be interested in a post in a Romney administration. As a former prosecutor and Harvard Law School graduate, he would be qualified for many positions. One possible job might be head of the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice. Putting Davis in charge of the federal office that monitors voter-ID laws passed by states and enforces civil-rights laws would be a clear signal that the hyper-politicized Eric Holder era was over at Justice.

John Fund is national-affairs columnist for NRO and a co-author of the newly released Who’s Counting? How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk (Encounter Books).


nationalreview.com