Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : NOK... without the BS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lahcim Leinad who wrote (138)	8/25/2012 5:23:11 PM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 580

In cross licensing there are usually no $$$$s. You must be talking about royalties like Apple pays Nokia. And it is stupid for any company to pay royalties when they have design work arounds. What Apple won is a verdict for products that most are not even available (like my Vibrant who used the bounce back patent and its shape resembled the iPhone 3GS). But the Galaxy SIII looks nothing like it, was not part of the verdict, and does NOT used the bounce back patent. Apple of course is welcome to file a new lawsuit. But right now this verdict does not touch the Galaxy SIII or ANY Android phone running Android 4.0 or higher that was specifically designed to work around the patent mine field.