Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : kazakstan goldfields symbol kgfc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: roger fontaine who wrote (325)	11/30/1997 5:50:00 AM
From: bconard	Respond to of 367

<I don't like the amount they settled for and if we do the same we are in trouble.> Roger, I agree. $0.10 (approx) on the dollar is a treible settelment, but do we know if PRL had followed the terms of their agreement with KAS gov? KGFC says that they did and that they have a letter from the gov. stating that they were current with all of their obbligations. If all of these cos were current with their obbligations, then it might make sense for them to band together to share the cost of a legal battle, but I would guess that there as many different situations as there are cos, which would make it very difficult for them to join forces. Hopefully KGFC will have better luck than PRL. Regards, Bob