SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (504433)8/26/2012 10:59:59 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794220
 
Agreed wholeheartedly.

It's something I can't rationalize, the media knows how bad Pelois, Reid, and Obama are, yet do they not realize their zealous support of a corrupt government makes them equally responsible for the direction America is heading?

The only scenario I can imagine is like when the press blows the cover on some secret program or plan. I can't remember who it was, some recent newsman said if he discovered the Normandy invasion fleet, he absolutely would blow the lid on all of it.

Of course then Roosevelt would have him put in front of a firing squad; ironic that may be the direction we are heading today in view of recent stories in the press of people speaking their opposition of the current administration. Instead of a firing squad, your simple basic run of the mill mob shows up at your front door.



To: Bill who wrote (504433)8/26/2012 11:22:36 PM
From: Sr K  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794220
 
You want to suffer in your own misery.

Here are some numbers. The DJIA and Nasdaq are higher, the S&P 500 is down about 5.5 points, from 1/3/2007.

DateNasdaq% Chng.§S&P 500% Chng.§Dow Jones% Chng.§Notes
January 3, 20072423.161416.6012,474.52
October 9, 20072803.91+15.71%1565.15+10.49%14,164.53+13.55%The day the DJIA and S&P 500 peaked.
October 10, 20072811.61+0.27%1562.47-0.17%14,078.69-0.61%The day the NASDAQ peaked.
January 2, 20082609.63-7.18%1447.16-7.38%13,043.96-7.35%
June 27, 20082315,63-11.27%1278.38-11.66%11,346.51-13.01%The day the bear market declared.
November 4, 20081780.12-23.13%1005.75-21.33%9,625.28-15.17% Election day
January 2, 20091632.21-8.31%899.35-10.58%9,034.69-6.14%
January 20, 20091440.86-11.72%804.47-10.55%7,949.09-12.02% Inauguration of Barack Obama
March 9, 20091268.64-11.95%676.53-15.90%6507.04-18.14%The day the DJIA, S&P 500 and NASDAQ bottomed.
October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009-1543-54.9%-886-56.6%-7657-53.9%Cumulative change (from peak to bottom)
[8] [9] [10]

§Values represent percent change from previous date listed in table.
[ edit]Opinions regarding the cause
During the bear market a heavy debate ensued as to whose fault the falling market was. The political parties were heavily divided during this period. [11] For the most part there were three camps: Ones that simply blamed the economy, others that wanted to pin the passing Bush Administration and others that wanted to push the blame on the newly arriving Obama Administration.

[ edit]Blaming the economy
In February 2007, a coming recession and bear market was predicted by Paul Lamont due to a growing debt bubble, the housing bubble and lack of car sales. [12]

en.wikipedia.org–2009

The question to ask this election year is not "Are you better off now than 4 years ago?" which was August 2008, before the GSEs were put into conservatorship, before Lehman Brothers filed bankruptcy, before TARP, and before the banking crisis and the takeovers of WaMu and Wachovia, but "Are you better off now than 43 months ago?" Or, "Are you better off now than on 1/20/2009"?