SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (94003)8/28/2012 5:29:58 PM
From: average joe  Respond to of 219510
 
Jonathan Kay: The Fairbairn case is an indictment of the Canadian Senate



Jonathan Kay | Aug 28, 2012 12:09 PM ET | Last Updated: Aug 28, 2012 1:41 PM ET
More from Jonathan Kay | @jonkay

John Major/PostmediaLiberal Senator Joyce Fairbairn.

This week, it was revealed that Canadian Senator Joyce Fairbairn was permitted to cast votes in the Senate more than three months after being declared legally incompetent on grounds of Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Predictably, the news engendered a good deal of callous-seeming social-media snickering. One of my friends, for instance, wrote on Facebook that the case “confirms what we already knew: you don’t need to be legally competent to be a Liberal politician.”

On the other side, people who actually know Fairbairn are outraged by the public focus on her health. One Chrétien-era Liberal published a blog called “leave Joyce alone,” in which he mused about retribution: “Every Liberal staffer who spots a drunken, stoned or otherwise indisposed Conservative Parliamentarian will be provided with an online spot to record and document what they have observed.” Ray Heard, another veteran Liberal, described fond memories of Senator Fairbairn on his Facebook page, and said that the coverage of her decline was “sickening” and “cruel.”

These pleas are well-intentioned — but wrong. The folks commenting on this story in the mainstream press and social media, even the snarky ones, aren’t mocking Senator Fairbairn. They’re mocking what her case says about the Senate. And they’re absolutely right to do so, even if the underlying news story is sad and personal. In fact, I know of no single episode that better summarizes the need for Senate reform.

Either the Canadian Senate is important and useful, or it is not. And if it is important and useful, then it demands intellectually competent members — which Ms. Fairbarn, sadly, isn’t anymore. If she is not legally competent to enter into a contract to buy a house or sell stock, why did her fellow Senate Liberals see fit to line her up to vote on legislation affecting 33-million people? The fact that they saw nothing wrong with this suggests that they themselves see their body as a sinecure pasture. And obviously, that candid insight into Senators’ own views is something deserving of reportage and even mockery.

Moreover, the fact that the chief of staff to Liberal Senate leader James Cowan co-signed a declaration that Fairbairn was legally incompetent, and shared legal responsibility for her personal care, adds a bizarre aspect to the story. Party politics is a reality in the Senate, and one of Cowan’s functions, in some cases, is to encourage the Liberal Senate caucus to vote in a certain way. Is it not surreal — and perhaps even creepy and unethical — that a man counting votes has on his personal staff a person who has legal responsibility for a mentally incapacitated human being who holds such a vote?

None of this — absolutely none of it — reflects badly on Senator Fairbairn. But it does reflect badly on the Senate, Senator Cowan, and the whole atmosphere of country-club uselessness within an entity whose functions apparently are regarded by insiders as less important or intellectually arduous than signing one’s name to a housing contract or cell phone plan. And the people who say so have nothing to apologize for.

National Post
jkay@nationalpost.com
Twitter @jonkay

fullcomment.nationalpost.com



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (94003)8/28/2012 5:31:23 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219510
 
Liberal leadership allowed ‘legally incompetent’ senator to vote months after dementia diagnosis

Glen McGregor and Jordan Press, Postmedia News | Aug 27, 2012 4:34 PM ET | Last Updated: Aug 27, 2012 5:30 PM ET

More from Postmedia News

Tyler Anderson for National Post)Joyce Fairbairn in 2005. Fairbairn was diagnosed with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type by her geriatric psychiatrist in February, according to a letter sent to Senate officials by her niece, Patricia McCullagh

OTTAWA — The Liberal leadership in the Senate allowed a veteran senator to vote on legislation and spend public dollars for four months after she was diagnosed with dementia and declared legally incompetent.

Sen. Joyce Fairbairn regularly attended Senate sittings and voted along party lines before the Upper Chamber rose for the summer at the end of June.

Fairbairn was diagnosed with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type by her geriatric psychiatrist in February, according to a letter sent to Senate officials by her niece, Patricia McCullagh.

Related
  • Senator’s wife, 23, released from jail after in-flight fight on stipulation she has no contact with 69-year-old husband

    It is unclear when the Liberals knew about the diagnosis, but by April, the top aide to Liberal Senate leader James Cowan had co-signed a declaration that Fairbairn was legally incompetent, according to a letter from McCullagh, obtained by Postmedia News.

    McCullagh, Fairbairn’s closest relative, wrote to the Clerk of the Senate Gary O’Brien in August to warn of the senator’s worsening health, copying the letter to Cowan and Senate Speaker Noel Kinsella.

    “As you know, Sen. Fairbairn has dementia of the Alzheimer’s type,” McCullagh wrote.

    “She has declined significantly over the past year and is no longer able to look after herself, having had 24-hour, full-time care for the past 18 months.”

    The letter indicates that Cowan’s chief of staff, Len Kuchar, who as “agent” shares legal responsibility for Sen. Fairbairn’s personal care with McCullagh, co-signed the declaration sometime in April.

    Kuchar could not be reached for comment Monday.

    As the Ottawa Citizen reported last week, the Liberals said Fairbairn will go on an extended sick leave once the Upper Chamber reconvenes in September. When asked about Fairbairn’s condition in the spring, the party insisted she was doing fine.

    Liberal Senate whip Jim Munson last week said that he never doubted Fairbairn knew what she was voting on during the session.

    In the months after the declaration of incompetence, Fairbairn voted 12 times in the Senate. She also authorized more than $85,000 in spending, according to the quarterly expense reports her office filed. However, she travelled less between her home and Ottawa, spending less than $4,000 from March until the end of May, rather than the $13,000 in travel spending she averaged over the previous three quarters.

    McCullagh said in her letter she spent part of the summer with Fairbairn at her home in Lethbridge, Alta., and found the senator’s awareness and memory had deteriorated over the previous month.

    “Sen. Fairbairn has considerable difficulty carrying out any of her duties as senator and will not return to Ottawa for the foreseeable future.”

    Conservative Sen. David Tkachuk, who chairs the Senate’s board of internal economy, was also copied on McCullagh’s letter.

    Tkachuk says he has asked Cowan’s office for more information and documentation to support the sick leave request. The board has also asked for a legal opinion on Fairbairn’s situation before deciding what, if anything, the Senate should do.

    “I’m going to do it with as much sympathy for her case as possible. but respecting the fact that this is a Canadian institution as well,” Tkachuk said. “It’s a tragic circumstance,” Tkachuk added, noting that he had seen his father struggle with Alzheimer’s.

    Under Senate rules, a doctor’s note must be produced for a sick leave of more than six days and senators must still attend once every two sessions.

    Under new rules set to be adopted this fall, the Senate as a whole can decide to make a seat vacant, triggering a selection and nomination process, if a senator fails to show up for two sessions.

    Fairbairn is not scheduled to retire from the Senate until November 2014. It is unclear why she is taking sick leave rather than stepping down, as seriously ill senators have done in the past.

    Patients with Alzheimer’s dementia experience memory loss, confusion and impaired cognitive abilities. Although symptoms can come and go, the effects of the disease become progressively more severe over time.

    Fairbairn, a former journalist, worked as a communications aide to Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau. He named her to the Senate in 1984.

    Since then, she has focused much of her work on literacy and disability issues.

    news.nationalpost.com