SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GOLDIGER who wrote (28690)11/29/1997 11:17:00 AM
From: go4it  Respond to of 35569
 
I guess it is a very good thing that we have 3rd party verification from not one but 2 independent engineering firms. I sure would hate to get caught up in one of those bloody scams.



To: GOLDIGER who wrote (28690)11/29/1997 2:05:00 PM
From: E. Charters  Respond to of 35569
 
well it sounds like a good description of Canadian Mining Promotion to me.

The difference between a dirt pile scam and a real mining promotion may seem slight. And it has been pointed out that you can lose as much through honest incompetence or undercapitalization and bad markets as
you can with a scam any day.

I have a real dirt pile scam that reads exactly the same as most tenets of the above description. Mine is genuine but still might fail in a genuine manner for any of the above reasons that are set forth as excuses. But the chief reason it would fail is the reasons most businesses fail: lack of money.

The first thing to ask in any mining scam is: Is the president honest? Second is: And does he intend to start a mine? No honest person will put in production a money losing proposition. However today's price of metals are absolutely immaterial. The average price over the next five years might be germane though.

I guess it boils down to this. 1. Intent 2. ability 3. capital

And finally the junior market. Which is all about what smells good today amidst this pile of garbage?