SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocket Red who wrote (102177)8/28/2012 4:43:35 PM
From: Western Rookie  Respond to of 233791
 
the big difference in hole 94 is that where t he gold has lower values, the copper is still elevated. Which is not consistent with the rest of the holes where there is correlation between gold and copper mineralization. In that hole you can justify a 0.15 cutoff because you have .4 to 3% copper values. Not so with the rest of the holes where you look at 0.15 g/t and trace copper values.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News