Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (5841)	11/29/1997 12:23:00 PM
From: Caxton Rhodes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Ramsey! Offensive stuff??? I only post the true and pure!!! And sometimes when other threads are showing a lack there of, I try to help them out. You know that. Often it is not appreciated, especially in the flat world. I have often had to sop up my tears from my keyboard after being flamed on the flat world thread. Seroiusly guys, Ramsey's right, didn't everyone learn about sticks and stones in kindergarten? Who cares? Lighten up! have some fun! Dream of dogs munching on tassled loafer offspring eaters or bankrupt squareheads, or as I prefer, Uma Thurman (http://www.gnt.net/~emelbeee/movies/stars/umathurman/uma01.jpg). Caxton

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (5841)	11/29/1997 6:33:00 PM
From: Duane L. Olson	Respond to of 152472

Ramsey, appreciate your taking the time to share your views and offer suggestions. Please check the following "proposed rules" for the SI, and see if they conflict with anything you have said.. 1. Free Speech should be maximized. Any legal speech is permitted, so long as affected members are freely engaged in a mutual discussion. No views should be barred from any thread, so long as they do not violate rules 2 and 3. 2. Comments attacking an individual rather than an issue or viewpoint are not tolerated. 3.. An SI member has the right not to be contacted by anyone to/about whom they are not posting and by whom they have requested not to be contacted. Thanks for your time... dlo P.S. I enjoy very much going //OT//; I'm surprised you got a different impression somehow... dlo "The Saintly One" P.P.S. Judging from other mail I am receiving, the SI is roughly following the above rules already. There are folks no longer with us. P.P.P.S. Concur the post I used as an example was "mild"; I used it only because it was the last in a string after the individual was politely requested not to make further contact. Most of the earlier abuse was not against me. Could we agree that if you break into my house to scream epithets at me, that this might go beyond "free speech"? P.P.P.P.S. Would you also perhaps agree that someone who feels a need to attack a person, rather than attacking that person's viewpoint, might be somewhat deficient in the intellectual arena? At least they come across as unarmed opponents in a battle of wits -- present company excepted, of course, Ramsey <<gg>> All seriousness aside, I would appreciate your commments, as I am making a valiant attempt to avoid taking your advice :-) dlo "The Saintly One"

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (5841)	12/1/1997 10:51:00 AM
From: Duane L. Olson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Ramsey What's a good entry point into QCOM? //OT// After two days and nights of diligent research, I couldn't find any support for your accusation against poor Caxton. Will give you one chance to cite evidence or recant before I turn you in to the cybercops!! <g> dlo P.S. Here was my semi-semi-semi-final post on the subject to Shane, on the LSI thread, who slapped me in the face with the TERMS OF USE that everybody says Yes, Yes, Yea, Yea, and verily to, when they sign up for the SI .http://www.exchange2000.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-2845193 Hope you don't mind if I drop by the QCOM now and then (whenever kindergarten lets out for the day). And thanks to all for the inputs!!..... dlo "The Saintly One"