Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: THE ANT who wrote (94039)	8/29/2012 2:32:48 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Respond to of 218659

klaser my observation is that advancement in technology made the cycles much shorter on any development but not the development of intellect and ability to innovate. Until computers will take over human intellect and true innovation big changes will take at least a generation

To: THE ANT who wrote (94039)

8/29/2012 4:37:07 AM

From: TobagoJack

Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 218659

let us see how long it would take for the chinese either to absorb or give up on businessweek.com

this was a good first try foxnews.com

... by McConaghy Boats ( mcconaghyboats.com ) in Zhu Hai, China telegraph.co.uk

until recently the boat was anchored in deepwater bay here on the southside of hong kong for all of us plebs to gawk at as we ride into the city to work our day

my working premise is that even as growth decelerates for china gross export revenue, china net export revenue shall increase

my assumption is that 3 months in china is equal to about 1 year in usa and 3-5 years in europe, and if so, one generation elsewhere would be equal to about 15 years in china