SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RMF who wrote (55068)8/31/2012 7:21:32 AM
From: jlallen3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 
Nonsense. The speakers were very effective....Rubio, Mrs. Romney and Ryan in particular.



To: RMF who wrote (55068)8/31/2012 9:27:42 AM
From: Peter Dierks1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Obviously you consumed the convention through the liberal media.

Susana Martinez gave a very effective and emotional speech. Marco Rubio certainly reached anyone listening. Condoliza Rice was awesome. Nicki Haley gave a great speech. It was inspiring and the stories of these fine people and their immediate ancestors rising from poverty was inspiring.

If you had watched the speeches in real time you would have been very impressed. When you get the leftspin criticism rather than the actual speeches you are poisoned by those who hate American the land of opportunity.

I can hardly wait for the DNC so we can hear what class envy sounds like.



To: RMF who wrote (55068)8/31/2012 12:27:49 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
New Black Panthers-We'll Create a Military to Murder Babies & Skin White People

youtube.com



To: RMF who wrote (55068)9/2/2012 11:02:27 PM
From: greatplains_guy1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 
Healthy Ridicule
The Republicans have some fun at the president's expense.
August 31, 2012, 3:02 p.m. ET.

By JAMES TARANTO
TAMPA, Fla.--Here was our favorite line from Mitt Romney's convention speech: "President Obama promised to begin to slow the rise of the oceans and to heal the planet. My promise is to help you and your family."

We liked it even better when we saw that the New York Times's Nicholas Kristof had tweeted: "Seriously, Romney's speech esp troubled me by mocking rising seas/climate change. The dismissiveness was appalling." Gaia is a jealous Goddess, and She will not be mocked!

It actually hadn't occurred to us that the Romney line was a repudiation of global warmism. If so, that's lagniappe. What we enjoyed was the deft way in which Romney punctured Obama's self-aggrandizement--by quoting his most immodest promise ever, pausing for effect, then making an almost comically modest promise of his own.


Previewing Romney's speech last week, Peggy Noonan advised him to use humor: "President Obama can't stand to be made fun of. His pride won't allow it, his amour propre cannot countenance a joke at his own expense. If Mr. Romney lands a few very funny lines about the president's leadership, Mr. Obama will freak out. That would be fun, wouldn't it?"

Romney managed to do so at least once. In a somewhat similar vein was the more-in-sorrow-than-anger condescension of his assertion that "I wish President Obama had succeeded, because I want America to succeed." No doubt journalism's fearless "fact checkers" will be on the case. FACT: Romney is GLAD Obama failed! PANTS ON FIRE!!!!

If Romney can strike a similar tone face to face with the president, the debates ought to be a blast. And he wasn't the only one having fun at Obama's expense. Clint Eastwood, a former mayor of Carmel, Calif., performed an apparently improvised routine in which he carried on a dialogue with an empty chair in which he pretended the president was sitting. It was very odd, but the crowd loved it. And, as Rhetorican.com notes, the president felt compelled to issue a rebuttal: a photo of a chair with him in it!

Throughout the convention Republicans made hay of Obama's infamous Friday the 13th "You didn't build that" speech. Romney celebrated immigrants to America, who "came, not just in pursuit of the riches of this world, but for the richness of this life. Freedom, freedom of religion, freedom to speak their mind, freedom to build a life and, yes, freedom to build a business with their own hands." The previous night, Paul Ryan said:

If small-business people say they made it on their own, all they are saying is that nobody else worked seven days a week in their place. Nobody showed up in their place to open the door at 5 in the morning. Nobody did their thinking, and worrying, and sweating for them. After all that work, and in a bad economy, it sure doesn't help to hear from their president that government gets the credit. What they deserve to hear is the truth: Yes, you did build that.

Many other speakers touched on the same theme. The tone was indignant, not lighthearted, which was suitable given the viciousness of the president's attack on Americans who've earned their success.

" 'We did build that,' has already been established as one of the more dishonest political memes in a campaign season undisturbed by shame," the Times's Bill Keller harrumphed on Tuesday, after the convention showed a video in which three small-business men responded to the Obama attack:

The Republicans took a clumsy phrase from an Obama speech in July. . . . The Republican spin-masters whipped this into a preposterous claim that Obama denied American entrepreneurs any credit for their creations. The fact that this slogan has been thoroughly debunked has not kept it from being the defining theme in Tampa.

Keller actually claims that Obama "um, never actually said" what the GOP video quotes him as saying and what Keller himself shows that Obama said by providing an even lengthier quote than appeared in the video.

Obama's journalistic supporters live in a bizarre alternate reality in which a politician's actual words mean nothing. When the president says something foolish and offensive, he didn't say that. Meanwhile every comment from a Republican can be translated, through a process of free association, to: "We don't like black people."

The question of race is central to the leftist media's protectiveness toward Obama, who has both benefited and suffered from a racial double standard. As the late Geraldine Ferraro pointed out in 2008--and was attacked for pointing out--Obama would not have risen so quickly had he been white. No sane person believed that stuff about casting down the oceans and mending "the planet," but a lot of Americans thought electing a black president would be a salve for racial wounds.

Obama rose in 2008 as a symbol of racial aspirations--the black aspiration to be recognized as fully American and the white aspiration to redeem the sin of racism. That made it difficult to criticize him, much less to mock him. John McCain's campaign was hobbled by a fear of appearing racist, and Obama himself received a degree of deference that is excessive for any politician.

The left has not moved beyond seeing Obama as a racial symbol, and that is for two reasons. First, his record as president doesn't have much else to recommend it, so that crying racism is about the best they can do as an argument for re-election. Second, it is of great psychological importance to American left-liberals to believe that their opponents are racist and they themselves are not. Their self-image as a moral elite revolves around the imputation of invidious racial attitudes to others.

Romney and the Republicans, however, have moved on. This was best exemplified by the nominee's birth-certificate quip, which we wrote about on Monday. Birtherism, once mortifying to mainstream conservatives and Republicans, is now just a joke, although the left continues to take it very seriously.

It is healthy for America that the president be criticized and even mocked. Deference to a Dear Leader has no place in a democracy. It's healthy for race relations, too, that he be judged on his record rather than held to a lower standard in the name of racial progress. When a black politician is treated just like any other politician, that's genuine progress.

If Obama had been subject to the usual rigors of politics in 2008 and before, and if his backers in the media and elsewhere had not been so keen before and during his presidency to deflect criticism by invoking race, he probably would have a thicker skin, better arguments and a deeper understanding of America. Those qualities would make an incumbent a better bet for re-election. Then again, without the racial symbolism and all the accompanying baggage, he probably would still be the junior senator from Illinois (if that). Life is full of trade-offs.

Romney's speech continued the convention's theme, noted here Wednesday, of appealing specifically to women. But whereas we had some quibbles with Ann Romney's special pleading on behalf of her sex, we rather liked Mitt's formulation in describing the Romneys' life as a young family:

These were tough days on Ann, particularly. She was heroic through it all. Five boys with our families a long way away. I had to travel a lot for my job then, and I'd call and try to offer support. But every mom knows that that does not help get the homework done or get the kids out the door to school. I knew that her job as a mom was harder than mine. I knew without question that her job as a mom was a lot more important than mine.


Implicit in this is a very effective rebuttal to all the left's "war on women" nonsense. Romney's account is entirely traditionalist inasmuch as it puts the family at the center of life, but the opposite of misogynistic in that it puts the mother and her domestic labors at the center of the family.

It would be nice if someone would say a word about fathers, whose presence is vitally important to a child's socialization even if their domestic duties are less labor-intensive than Mom's. But politicians go where the votes are. Almost every family includes a mother, but in recent decades divorce and illegitimacy have thinned the ranks of fathers (except of course in the bare biological sense). Anyway, it's hard for anyone to argue with a celebration of motherhood.

To be sure, some women will be impervious to any effort Romney might make to attract their votes. We saw a group of them yesterday afternoon, standing across the street from a shopping center just outside the convention's perimeter. They were dressed in odd pink outfits, and two of them held aloft a banner that read VAGINA IS NOT A 4-LETTER WORD. (Math is hard.)

At first we thought they were there to protest the event we were attending, billed as a "Celebration of Pro-Life Women Leaders" (they included Sen. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota and Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch of Wisconsin). But it turned out instead they were opposing the restaurant downstairs from the venue to which we were headed.

"Hooters discriminates against women's body parts!" one of the pink protesters screamed as we walked by. Perhaps she's right, but one wonders what kind of equal-opportunity effort she would propose to remedy the problem.

Arriving at the celebration, we were crestfallen to learn the bar offered only soft drinks. It turns out there are both wet and dry pro-lifers. The ladies at the Susan B. Anthony List (counterpart to the pro-abortion Emily's List), who invited us, are among the former. But a co-sponsor, Concerned Women for America, has a policy against adult beverages at its functions, and the drys prevailed--until after the event, when we adjourned to the nearby "Woman Up Pavilion" for a tipple with the SBA ladies.

On that spirited note we bid farewell to Tampa and the Republican National Convention. Next week it is off to Charlotte, N.C., for the Democrats. We just hope we get invited to the Unconcerned Women for America party.

online.wsj.com



To: RMF who wrote (55068)9/7/2012 11:12:32 PM
From: greatplains_guy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Eastwood says his convention appearance was 'mission accomplished'
By PAUL MILLER
Published: September 7, 2012

AFTER?A week as topic No. 1 in American politics, former Carmel Mayor Clint Eastwood said the outpouring of criticism from left-wing reporters and liberal politicians after his appearance at the Republican National Convention last Thursday night, followed by an avalanche of support on Twitter and in the blogosphere, is all the proof anybody needs that his 12-minute discourse achieved exactly what he intended it to.


“President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” Eastwood told The Pine Cone this week. “Romney and Ryan would do a much better job running the country, and that’s what everybody needs to know. I may have irritated a lot of the lefties, but I was aiming for people in the middle.”


Breaking his silence


For five days after he thrilled or horrified the nation by talking to an empty chair representing Obama on the night Mitt Romney accepted the Republican nomination for president, Eastwood remained silent while pundits and critics debated whether his remarks, and the rambling way he made them, had helped or hurt Romney’s chances of winning in November.


But in a wide-ranging interview with The Pine Cone Tuesday from his home in Pebble Beach, he said he had conveyed the messages he wanted to convey, and that the spontaneous nature of his presentation was intentional, too.


“I had three points I wanted to make,” Eastwood said. “That not everybody in Hollywood is on the left, that Obama has broken a lot of the promises he made when he took office, and that the people should feel free to get rid of any politician who’s not doing a good job. But I didn’t make up my mind exactly what I was going to say until I said it.”


Eastwood’s appearance at the convention came after a personal request from Romney in August, soon after Eastwood endorsed the former Massachusetts governor at a fundraiser in?Sun Valley, Idaho. But it was finalized only in the last week before the convention, along with an agreement to build suspense by keeping it secret until the last moment.


Meanwhile, Romney’s campaign aides asked for details about what Eastwood would say to the convention.


“They vet most of the people, but I told them, ‘You can’t do that with me, because I don’t know what I’m going to say,’” Eastwood recalled.


And while the Hollywood superstar has plenty of experience being adored by crowds, he said he hasn’t given a lot of speeches and admitted that, “I really don’t know how to.” He also hates using a teleprompter, so it was settled in his mind that when he spoke to the 10,000 people in the convention hall, and the millions more watching on television, he would do it extemporaneously.

“It was supposed to be a contrast with all the scripted speeches, because I’m Joe Citizen,” Eastwood said. “I’m a movie maker, but I have the same feelings as the average guy out there.”


Eastwood is a liberal on social issues such as gay marriage and abortion, but he has strongly conservative opinions about the colossal national debt that has accumulated while Obama has been president, his failure to get unemployment below 6 percent, and a host of other economic issues.


“Even people on the liberal side are starting to worry about going off a fiscal cliff,” Eastwood said.



Last minute decisions


But what — exactly — would he say to the Republican delegates about the $16 trillion national debt and 8.3 percent unemployment rate?


Friends and associates weren’t as much help as he had hoped.


“Everybody had advice for me, except the janitor,” Eastwood said.


Early Thursday morning, when Eastwood left San Jose Airport on a private jet headed for Florida, he was still making up his mind. And even with his appearance just a few hours away, all Eastwood could tell Romney’s campaign manager, Matt Rhoades, and his aides, was “to reassure them that everything I would say would be nice about Mitt Romney.”


It was only after a quick nap in his hotel room a few blocks from the convention site, Eastwood said, that he mapped out his remarks — starting with his observation about politics in Hollywood, then challenging the president about the failure of his economic policies, and wrapping up by telling the public “they don’t have to worship politicians, like they were royalty or something.”


But even then, with just an hour before he appeared on stage, it still hadn’t occurred to Eastwood to use an empty chair as a stand-in for the president.


“I got to the convention site just 15 or 20 minutes before I was scheduled to go on,” he said. “That was fine, because everything was very well organized.”


After a quick trip through airport-style security, he was taken to a Green Room, where Archbishop Dolan of New York sought him out to say hello. Then he was taken backstage to wait for his cue. And that was when inspiration struck.


“There was a stool there, and some fella kept asking me if I wanted to sit down,” Eastwood said. “When I saw the stool sitting there, it gave me the idea. I’ll just put the stool out there and I’ll talk to Mr. Obama and ask him why he didn’t keep all of the promises he made to everybody.”


He asked a stagehand to take it out to the lectern while he was being announced.


“The guy said, ‘You mean you want it at the podium?’ and I said, ‘No, just put it right there next to it.’”


Then, with the theme song from “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly” as a musical introduction, and a huge picture of him as Josey Wales as the backdrop, Eastwood walked out to tremendous applause.


“The audience was super enthusiastic, and it’s always great when they’re with you instead of against you,” he said.



‘Enjoying themselves’


Speaking without any notes, Eastwood recalled the good feelings the whole nation had when Obama was elected, but said they had been dashed as the economy stayed in the doldrums despite massive stimulus spending. He decried the “stupid idea” of closing the detention center at Guantanamo Bay and putting terrorists on trial in New York City, joked about Vice President Joe Biden’s intellect and quizzed empty-chair Obama about what he says to people about his failed economic policies. He pretended Obama told Romney to do something “physically impossible” to himself, said it’s time to elect a “stellar businessman” as president instead of a lawyer, and, as a final point, told the people, “You own this country.”


When an elected official doesn’t “do the job, we’ve got to let ‘em go,” he said, and the crowd ate it up.


“They really seemed to be enjoying themselves,” Eastwood said.


Originally, he was told he could speak for six or seven minutes, and right before he went on, he was asked to keep it to five, but he said, “When people are applauding so much, it takes you 10 minutes to say five minutes’ worth.”


Also, there were no signals or cues of any kind, so “when you’re out there, it’s kind of hard to tell how much time is going by.”


He also said he was aware he hesitated and stumbled a bit, but said “that’s what happens when you don’t have a written-out speech.”


As he wrapped up his remarks, he was aware his presentation was “very unorthodox,” but that was his intent from the beginning, even if some people weren’t on board.


“They’ve got this crazy actor who’s 82 years old up there in a suit,” he said. “I was a mayor, and they’re probably thinking I know how to give a speech, but even when I was mayor I never gave speeches. I gave talks.”


Backstage, it was all congratulations and glad-handing, he said. And then he returned to the Green Room, where he listened to speeches by Marco Rubio and Mitt Romney. It wasn’t possible for him to watch the media coverage of his presentation.


But the country was listening as the television reporters and commentators covering his speech reacted to it. And they hated it.


“I have to say, as a fan, a movie fan, this was exceedingly strange. It just seemed like a very strange, unscripted moment,” said a shocked Andrea Mitchell on NBC.


“That was the weirdest thing I’ve ever seen at a political convention in my entire life,” said Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, barely concealing the condescension in her voice.


Bob Schieffer of CBS said it was “a big mistake to put Clint Eastwood on before Mitt Romney.”

On the Washington Post website, reporter Chris Cillizza wrote that “‘awkward’ may be the kindest term we can think of” to describe Eastwood’s speech.


“He hemmed. He hawed. He mumbled. He rambled,” Cillizza wrote.


And on CNN, Piers Morgan said Eastwood was “going bonkers” on the stage and said his presentation “looked like complete chaos.” He pressured his guests with questions like, “Weren’t you in pain while he was up there?”


But Eastwood wasn’t aware of any of it, and after the speeches were over, Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan, came backstage to thank him.


“They were very enthusiastic, and we were all laughing,” Eastwood said.


When he went outside to his car, a large crowd cheered and chanted lines from his speech.



An overnight rebellion


Back at his hotel, Eastwood had a room service dinner and went to bed. The next morning, he got up early and went straight to the airport, still unaware that his appearance was the No. 1 political topic in the nation.


“I read the Tampa newspaper, and every article said something negative about the convention, but there wasn’t much about me,” Eastwood said.


He had no idea that overnight, a rebellion had erupted online against the media’s condemnation of him, with thousands of bloggers, Twitterers and commentators calling him, “a genius,” “1,000 times more brilliant than the media,” and saying he’s “only gotten better with age.”


They also started posting their own versions of Eastwood’s empty chair in droves (“eastwooding”), and, on YouTube, replays of his remarks at the convention were being viewed millions of times.


Even into his 80s, Eastwood has an unprecedented record of success in Hollywood, and is still making two movies a year. He’s currently starring in “Trouble with the Curve,” and is about to direct a remake of “A Star is Born” — things he obviously couldn’t do if he were a befuddled senior citizen. To locals who know him, the idea that he is uninformed or senile is laughable.


Nevertheless, the bitter criticism has continued.


On Tuesday, Democratic Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa, called Eastwood “the perfect icon of the Republican tea party: an angry old white man spewing incoherent nonsense.”


Eastwood said people, including reporters, who were shocked by his remarks “are obviously on the left,” and he maintained that, while many Americans didn’t like the way he handled his convention appearance, millions more have something else on their minds.


“A lot of people are realizing they had the wool pulled over their eyes by Obama,” Eastwood said.


pineconearchive.com