Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MrLucky who wrote (505941)	9/2/2012 11:02:18 AM
From: skinowski	2 Recommendations Respond to of 794337

My viewpoint on the Israel situation: If Romney wants to serve two terms, he must put a decisive decision maker in State. If he allows Iran to have the nuke, it will be hung around his neck in 2016. He has to go with a Bolton type. wouldn't be too surprised if, confronted with someone who has, excuse me, balls - Iran would suspend the program. Just like they released the hostages as soon as Reagan became President. About Israel... Iranian nukes are a double danger, and both are of an existential nature. Besides the possibility of a blowout, they would discourage immigration - AND, over time, stimulate emigration out of that country. Who wants to live in a nation the size of New Jersey under a constant - and very real - nuclear threat? I thought about this a while back, and I think posted it here. Recently, I read the same thing in the last novel by Daniel Silva. People do not talk about it, but it seems this understanding is quite real.