SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (94238)9/3/2012 12:36:57 PM
From: RJA_  Respond to of 219995
 
bloomberg.com

<snip>
“That might take the form of announcing a flow of purchases of securities per month” that would continue “for as long as appropriate,” Williams said in an interview at Jackson Hole. The Fed would then “adjust this program as time goes on, either to increase it or decrease it, end it sooner or later, depending on how economic conditions develop.”

“There has been more talk among members of the FOMC of an open-ended program,” Dean Maki, chief U.S. economist at Barclays Plc, said in an interview at Jackson Hole. Such a program would be more effective because it “would emphasize the unlimited nature of the Fed’s balance sheet and that they’re willing to do as much as necessary.”

The minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee’s July 31- Aug. 1 meeting showed that many policy makers said a new bond- buying program should “be sufficiently flexible to allow adjustments, as needed, in response to economic developments or to changes in the committee’s assessment of the efficacy and costs of the program.”

‘Even Larger’

Williams said the purchases could consist of both Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities. He said the appropriate program may need to wind up being “at least as large as QE2 or arguably even larger again.”

The Fed bought a total of $2.3 trillion of securities from 2008 through June 2011. The first round of so-called quantitative easing consisted of mortgage-backed securities, federal agency debt and Treasuries, while the second round was limited to $600 billion of Treasuries.

<snip>



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (94238)9/3/2012 12:50:36 PM
From: Joseph Silent1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219995
 
The internal need for the individual to stand out is inherently western

though it is sweeping eastward to meet swarms, cookie-molds, bomb blasts and annihilation. Simultaneously, a kind of broad social order, even in disorder, may be sweeping westward, it seems..... though it's not as clear to me as the west-to-east transport.

It is that "need to stand-out" that does not know where to go and emerges through tattoos and mohawks and behavior that, at least at first, is in conflict with the surroundings. In high schools you'll see it in clotheswear, hairstyles and mannerisms. In universities you'll see it in colored or cowboy hats, funny ties and long hair. In places where it is not immediately visible, such as law offices and banks, it emerges in some other, likely devious, way.

The human ego may seem complex, but recognizing it's needs in operation is often simple.



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (94238)9/3/2012 4:08:57 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219995
 
Travellers faced rude officers, incorrect accusations by border employees

By Michael Tutton, The Canadian PressSeptember 3, 2012 11:10 AM

A complaints system run by the Canada Border Services Agency is documenting cases of travellers enduring rude behaviour and lengthy interrogations, as well as one case where someone was falsely identified as a person "with criminal ties." According to quarterly reports obtained by The Canadian Press through the Access to Information Act, there were 1,105 complaints — about six per day — about the services provided by the agency's employees from Jan. 7 until the end of June last year.

THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck


HALIFAX - A complaints system run by the Canada Border Services Agency is documenting cases of travellers enduring rude behaviour and lengthy interrogations, as well as one case where someone was falsely identified as a person "with criminal ties."

According to quarterly reports obtained by The Canadian Press through the Access to Information Act, there were 1,105 complaints — about six per day — about the services provided by the agency's employees from Jan. 7 until the end of June last year.

A report by the agency on the revamped complaints system obtained under freedom of information legislation says .0025 per cent of all travellers complain about the service from its employees, adding "this rate will be used in future media calls as it puts the Canada Border Services Agency in a positive light."

However, a civil liberties advocate says he is concerned about the incidents that have emerged and believes it demonstrates an independent oversight agency is needed — similar to arms-length commissions that oversee the RCMP and other police agencies.

In a separate record created from its database, the agency has documented 129 cases where complaints about "employee or officer conduct" were found to be valid by internal investigators.

Esme Bailey, a spokeswoman for the agency, says that doesn't necessarily mean officers conducted themselves improperly, as there are cases where the agency ruled the officer behaved properly but there was still an unnecessary wait or delay for a traveller.

"It means the client's concerns were generally founded on some level," she wrote in an email.

One of the records says that a highway border agent accused a traveller of "being someone he's not."

Bailey says in an email the record shows the clerk's early description of the complaint and it may have been revised later.

In the email, Bailey says: "(The) client name matches one with criminal ties. (The) client is required to obtain documents from his/her local FBI office and have them present the next time he/she is seeking entry into Canada."

Another case says a traveller complained that private information was given in a public area.

Bailey says in an email that the traveller felt the officer was overly officious and rude, and the traveller was questioned in an area where others were waiting. She says the agency "apologized for the behaviour of the officer involved."

In another incident, the agency sent a refund cheque to the wrong address and it was cashed by an unknown person. When the person who was supposed to receive the cheque called the agency to complain, an agency employee "did not believe client," Bailey says.

"(The) client got upset," Bailey wrote. "(The) employee later apologized to the client directly for the misunderstanding. ... a new refund cheque was issued to the client."

There were also cases of clients upset about their interviews at border crossings.

One traveller said they'd gone through an unreasonably lengthy interview after being taken into an office for questioning.

Bailey writes in an email: "the delays for the secondary examination were found to be lengthy. Therefore the allegations that the procedures were not followed properly were found to be valid."

"The client alleged it took three hours for the examination, but documentation shows that it took one hour and 12 minutes."

Bailey declined to give dates, locations or indicate what discipline officers received, citing privacy concerns.

Roch Tasse, the national co-ordinator of the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, said the complaints system should be shifted to an independent agency and more complete descriptions provided to the public.

In the case of a traveller being incorrectly identified as a person with criminal ties, he asked whether further questioning could have cleared up the confusion.

"Surely there's enough information in the system, or there should be if there's not, to show you're not the same person," he said in an interview. "What are the odds that you have the same birth date, live in the same city ... I don't know why we have those incidents."

Tasse said his group's reviews of border incidents two years ago showed more serious incidents and he questions if the internal review system is effective.

"We're dealing here with an internal complaints system, not an independent body. So regardless of the content and the outcome, this is an agency investigating itself following complaints," he said.

Ronald Anglehart, the acting director of the agency's complaints unit, said the agency has made the system available on the Internet since 2011, and it is using the results to improve its performance.

He said as a result of the complaints system, the agency has developed a brochure available at ports of entry to explain why people are sometimes taken aside for questioning or inspections when crossing the border.

"We're hoping that by educating clients they'll have a greater understanding of what to expect, and that will reduce complaints," he said.

Bailey says the agency has created three training initiatives for employees to help improve their performance.

The agency, which has 5,500 uniformed officers, processed more than 90 million travellers in 2011 and the complaints total only a tiny fraction of the total, she says. The agency also says it had 217 compliments through the feedback system in 2011.

Travellers faced rude officers, incorrect accusations by border employees
    The Telegram, Newfoundland, Canada

    Monday, September 03, 2012

    Border Services union wary of reality-television exposure
      Victoria Times-Colonist, Canada

      Thursday, August 30, 2012

      Border Services union wary of reality TV exposure
        Victoria Times-Colonist, Canada

        Wednesday, August 29, 2012



        To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (94238)9/3/2012 8:33:47 PM
        From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219995
         
        Free Speech? No! We're Canadians!

        ottawacitizen.com

        RCMP admits grounding union-hired plane flying anti-Harper banner (with video)


        By Matthew Pearson, Ottawa CitizenSeptember 3, 2012 8:00 PM

        OTTAWA — A pilot hired by the Public Service Alliance of Canada to fly over Ottawa and Gatineau with a political banner was ordered to land his plane, the RCMP admitted Monday, even though the aircraft had not entered restricted airspace.

        The union says it paid for a plane to fly over the capital region for three hours on Saturday with a trailing banner that read, in French, “StephenHarperNousDéteste.ca” (Stephen Harper hates us), to coincide with the popular Hot Air Balloon Festival in Gatineau.

        But things didn’t go according to plan.

        “When the plane took off from Rockcliffe (airport), it was flying for about an hour-and-a-half and the pilot received a message that he must land his plane immediately and that the RCMP wanted to question him,” said PSAC’s Larry Rousseau.

        It remains unclear why the plane was ordered out of the sky as the RCMP and the Quebec-based pilot offered conflicting stories.

        RCMP spokeswoman Cpl. Lucy Shorey said officers on the ground spotted the plane and felt it was flying within restricted airspace over Parliament Hill, so they ordered the pilot to return to the Rockcliffe airport for questioning.
        Shorey said the RCMP had confirmed the plane had not entered restricted airspace, but she offered little reason for why it was nonetheless ordered out of the sky. “The plane appeared to be flying at a low level and that’s why the RCMP requested (it) to land,” she said. “There was no issue once we spoke to the pilot.”

        But the plane’s pilot, Jean-Pierre Ciambella, explained in an email sent to the union — which it shared with the Citizen — that he repeatedly checked with air traffic control to ensure that he was outside Ottawa’s restricted zones, and that at no time was he informed by air traffic control that he had penetrated the restricted area above Parliament Hill.

        Ciambella says that upon returning to the airport the RCMP who met him said they appreciated his cooperation in bringing his flight to an early end, but they told him that the message on the banner could be construed as hate speech — hence their request for him to return to the airport for questioning.

        In the email, which was written in French, Ciambella says that he denied to the RCMP that merely promoting a client’s website could be considered hate speech towards the prime minister. He added that he had been flying promotions for the site in Quebec since August 19th, and told them “don’t shoot the messenger.”

        In response, he says that the RCMP told him that he was in the national capital, they were responsible for the prime minister’s security, and therefore were obligated to intercept him.

        Ciambella has not yet been reached for comment.

        A Quebec pilot named Jean-Pierre Ciambella, who also goes by the name Gian Piero Ciambella, made headlines in 2006 when he made an emergency Sunday afternoon landing on Montreal’s downtown Park Avenue. It was later determined that Ciambella had taken off with a broken fuel gauge, for which he was fined $750.

        The RCMP, which oversees security on the Hill, says it was worried about a possible security threat, not the banner’s political message.

        “This was not about any type of message. This was about the security of Parliament Hill, which is something the RCMP takes very seriously,” she said.

        Union leaders and experts scoffed at the suggestion the banner could be seen as hate speech.

        “We don’t see criticism of the prime minister as being hate speech, we see it as being freedom of speech,” Rousseau said.

        “I’ve never, ever heard of anything like this for any previous prime minister. It has become so absurd to see that anything that is critical of the prime minister is immediately met with fear and trepidation.”

        “What kind of country of are we coming to if we cannot openly criticize the prime minister without the security forces taking someone aside for interrogations?”

        Errol Mendes, a University of Ottawa law professor, said the criminal code provisions around hate speech focus on the “wilful promotion of hatred directed at an identifiable group.”

        “It’s beyond ridiculous,” he said. “It should not even be contemplated unless of course Stephen Harper is an identifiable group.”

        “Something like this is so far removed from hate speech that it’s almost laughable,” Mendes said.

        When the story first broke Monday, the RCMP directed all media inquiries to Nav Canada, the private company that provides air traffic control services in Canada.

        It confirmed the plane never breached a restricted fly zone in Ottawa and said its air traffic controllers never instructed the plane to land.

        “We did not communicate that to the pilot,” said Nav Canada spokesman Ron Singer.

        While the RCMP confirmed that its officers requested the plane to land, it remains unclear who exactly communicated that message to the pilot.

        “Well, how does the pilot know he had to land?,” asked PSAC’s Rousseau. “Who could communicate with the pilot? The RCMP have a direct line to the radio? It doesn’t make sense to me.”

        Rousseau said PSAC may try to bring the plane back to Ottawa in the future. They paid the pilot $1,000 per hour, he said.

        The StephenHarperNousDéteste.ca website, launched by PSAC’s Quebec region, is part of the union’s national campaign, which is designed to draw attention to how all Canadians are affected by cuts to the federal public service. Some public servants have also been wearing T-shirts and buttons that say, “Stephen Harper hates me.”
        “It may be somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but it’s a remark that says, ‘What has he got against us personally?’” Rousseau said.

        The union has hired a plane to take similar flights over Montreal and other Quebec communities over the past few weeks.

        http://www.ottawacitizen.com/RCMP+admits+grounding+union+hired+plane+flying+anti+Harper+banner+with+video/7182901/story.html#ixzz25SMY02l1