Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (28703)	11/29/1997 7:52:00 PM
From: Bob Jagow	Respond to of 35569

Chuca, Wonder whether "the nominated recovery process" could have been developed by Auric?

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (28703)	11/29/1997 10:25:00 PM
From: go4it	Respond to of 35569

Chuca, I didn't think I missed those notes. I may have been foolish for believing the progress reports as they were released and I may have made a few mistakes along the way but I never made up garbage like I see on this thread now. I don't want an improved FA. enough money and time has been spent on the damn thing IMO. I say drill the holes, calculate the reserves for financing purposes. Simultaneously develope the commercial mining process that best fits this mineralization and let's get this thing rolling. Daylight and dollars are a burning .... let's roll this puppy out and make it a reality. We should still be talking about a deposit of over 50MM ounces of gold alone even if the FA results are the average which I do not believe to be the case. If anyone has wondered why the funds haven't done a massive selloff of the stock then maybe that's why. Chuck