Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : GUMM - Gumm Tech International Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anaxagoras who wrote (65)	11/29/1997 10:36:00 PM
From: Mike M	Respond to of 148

Anax, <That's about what I thought you would say. Just a warning to the other readers of this thread....> You are still looking for a free ride Anax. Don't do any work just base every thing you know on a couple announcements and the earnings report. Cast a few aspersions on the CEO and past earnings and act like you really know something...when in reality you don't know this company at all... If there is any basis in fact to what I have been saying it will begin to be as plain as the nose on your face soon, Anax...Can't hide good news forever...If I am wrong then in six months you can say you were right all along. In the mean time, unless you really do know something try to keep your innuendoes to a minimum, please. Thanks, Mike

To: Anaxagoras who wrote (65)	11/29/1997 11:41:00 PM
From: Mike M	Respond to of 148

Anax, <Just a warning to the other readers of this thread> This is the most recent "expert" comment you have made, but I took the liberty of going back to some of your earlier ones...The next one was a real clever one you made to someone (a reference to GUMM's revenue prospects for 1998): <That sounds about right: $100, $200, $300..., heck they might even shoot the moon and hit $999. Once they no longer are able to count their barter arrangements as revenues, heck, the sky's the limit.> How about sourcing this one Anax...Shouldn't you have labeled this one as a warning to the readers of this thread- maybe you had an agenda...This is careless, uninformed mockery. What insight did you have of the company to air this spurious opinion....Let's see your source. In an earlier message you lament not being able to find shares to short...Interesting since the Wall Street Journal continues to show increasing shorts each month...They are up to 909K reported as of Wednesday's edition. This with an average of 57K shares being traded daily...If I were you I would hope that I was not responsible for encouraging one person to short a company I knew so little about... Can you imagine the chaos that will ensue if (yes, and I believe when) this company really does surprise all those shorters?.. I know, everybody is a big boy and responsible for their own decisions. But not so responsible that you don't have the obligation to warn them about me. Huh? One last comment, Anax, since you are so smart. Answer me this: If GUMM has no more value than just a specialty gum maker, then why is Nabisco, a well known gum maker, doing any business with them at all?....You are going to have to think on this next question. Do you think Nabisco, a multibillion dollar in sales company, would be interested in signing Gumm to a multiyear contract for a few hundred thousand dollars in sales? Get real. Affectionately Yours, Mike