Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : NOK... without the BS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stock Puppy who wrote (427)	9/6/2012 2:31:47 PM
From: Lahcim Leinad	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 580

Nokia Ad Fail Has Some Questioning New Lumia 920 Smartphone Camera (VIDEO) Nokia just learned an important lesson: Don't try and fool the internet. Yup. "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time." - Abe.

To: Stock Puppy who wrote (427)	9/6/2012 4:46:18 PM
From: Lahcim Leinad	Respond to of 580

Revisited the "apology." An apology is due – Nokia Conversations : the official Nokia blog Pathetic. The worst part: "Here is the video shown at the press conference shot using a Lumia 920. On the right is a Lumia 920 prototype with OIS. On the left is a smartphone without OIS. The difference is apparent." Sigh. Pray tell: which camera is on the left? A camera? You mean like maybe from 2001, or something? Who's in charge over there? Gilligan?

To: Stock Puppy who wrote (427)	9/7/2012 9:39:31 AM
From: Lahcim Leinad	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 580

More thoughts on dishonest product comparisons... Take a look at these, and let's cover them one by one: Nokia PureView - Nokia First of all, we do not know what make the competitor's camera is, so right there the whole "comparison" is flawed. Moving on... #1. Gal leaning on railing. The competitor's image is under exposed. We do not know why. Was it underexposed on purpose? Was it operator error? Was it a camera flaw? No hint, so the test is flawed. #2. River photo. See #1. #3. Gal leaning on tree. One camera was fired without flash, the other with flash. That's a comparison? Really? Flawed. #4. Street sign. See #3. Conclusion? Someone is trying to pull wool over our eyes, and methinks it's Nokia.