Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: frankw1900 who wrote (21860)	9/7/2012 1:35:59 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24758

There is no "ultra easy money" policy in place. The CBs didn't lower rates and they're not making excess money available. If you think otherwise, show me how. I've given a ton of data over the last 4 years showing the opposite. That doesn't count, but crap from crappers does? White can talk all the right talk, but it's hollow. Remember Clinton and Gore? How in '92 at the convention to review NAFTA, they talked the right talk, supply side economics, better than Laffer! What BS did they walk? Socialism that's supported by importing the Mexican. I don't need to read any more little kiddie academic hacks.

To: frankw1900 who wrote (21860)	9/7/2012 2:26:45 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24758

Instead of reading such rubbish, answer this: Why is bond buying sterilization by the world's major CBs so dangerous?

To: frankw1900 who wrote (21860)	9/7/2012 2:32:48 PM
From: The Wharf	Respond to of 24758

Thank You .

To: frankw1900 who wrote (21860)

9/8/2012 2:05:32 PM

From: The Wharf

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758

This belongs to you for the work you did to find it . To: The Wharf who wrote (28552)	9/8/2012 1:02:29 PM
From: carranza2	1 Recommendation of 28553

Fabulous, one of the best things I have ever seen posted at SI on the issue at hand. You are to be commended for noticing it and making it available. A wonderful resolution of the Keynes vs. Hayek debate, IMO. Yes, in the immediate now of a financial crisis, Keynesian stimulus is probably necessary, but to continue with it after the crisis has passed is deadly. The Austrians should rule the post-crisis period, the Keynesians should be put on the shelf after the crisis passes. Of course, the decisions are political, and politicians don't think much of Austrians because, well, their job is to take away the punch bowl after the crisis has passed. Brilliant!