SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (200549)9/7/2012 8:57:50 PM
From: No Mo Mo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 542013
 
Brooks - # 12 on the "Hack List"


---------------------------------
Thursday, Dec 15, 2011 10:00 AM PST

12. David Brooks The moderate conservative columnist hides appalling opinions behind "reasonable" language

By Alex Pareene



Last year, we gave New York Times columnist and liberal editors’ favorite moderate conservative David Brooks grief for being milquetoast and lazy. But this year, let’s hand it to the guy: When you want a truly vile opinion dressed up to sound innocuous, Brooks is your guy.

He can make a defense of racist demagoguing sound benign. He obfuscates and misleads on income inequality, while, as always, accusing those damned coastal liberal elites of disrespecting Real Americans. Accusing liberals of disrespecting Real Americans is one of Brooks’ go-to lines, even though there’s absolutely no evidence that he has any clue whatsoever how the middle and working classes live in America in 2011.

Everything, with Brooks, comes down to “values.” Bad things happen because of a lack of the correct “values,” and the correct “values” are essentially white upper-middle-class mid-20th-century bourgeois values. Poverty happens because the poor don’t have those values. Earthquakes happen because of a lack of those values. The sexual abuse of children happens because — you guessed it — America lost those important pre-’60s values. The abuses at Penn State, in Brooks’ worldview, went unreported because America has become “a society oriented around our inner wonderfulness.”

HACKIEST 2011 MOMENT:
That linked column on the abuses at Penn State was the sanitized version of Brooks’ comments on “Meet the Press,” in which he blamed both the failure to report the sexual abuses to the police and the riots following the firing of Joe Paterno more explicitly on “30 or 40 years” of “muddying the moral waters.” If it weren’t for women’s lib and the self-esteem movement, those kids could’ve been protected!




To: koan who wrote (200549)9/7/2012 9:41:44 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 542013
 
Brooks backed W up until about 2006 - tells you all you need to know about the assclown. I think he only stopped backing W so he could continue to present himself as "reasonable", but even then, his criticisms were VERY mild.

I know this because I regularly watched the PBS newshour then, and they'd have Brooks and Mark Sheilds on as the conservative and liberal guys once a week.

pbs.org

Looks like they still do..



To: koan who wrote (200549)9/7/2012 10:21:54 PM
From: freelyhovering  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 542013
 
I hate to watch him on Brooks and Shields on PBS as he reeks with 'smart insincerity and well hidden hostility" behind his smile. He is also a terrible flip-flopper who really doesn't understand his own mind, but fools a lot of people..



To: koan who wrote (200549)9/7/2012 10:46:58 PM
From: Ron  Respond to of 542013
 
Brooks is a neocon in disguise. I've read his stuff going back years. He masquerades so he can be a regular fixture on the pundit shows. Ever notice how about 10 pundits show up on all the news shows to bloviate and he is frequently one of them?
You wouldn't ever see him on a Bill Moyers program. Moyers doesn't participate in the east coast corporate media circle jerk. Brooks even regularly appears on PBS. He's a damn media parasite.