SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (507159)9/9/2012 7:15:01 PM
From: briskit14 Recommendations  Respond to of 793912
 
Ed, you sound a bit like a high school meany, which has totally caught me off guard. But to your previous post, you'll note I didn't object to the point of the fact check. If Obama wanted to distinguish himself from any spending, including while he was the junior senator, he would have voted against it. He did not. My question to you is if you are making the case that Obama is the restrained spender that we need? If so, on what basis? Awaiting your insightful, objective, articulate elucidations on Obama as our fiscal disciplinarian.



To: cnyndwllr who wrote (507159)9/9/2012 8:02:47 PM
From: briskit2 Recommendations  Respond to of 793912
 
PS, the reference to Osama was a hat tip and a wink to Ted Kennedy, who on at least one occasion referred to Barry as Osama. It was a literary cross-reference, which some, but not necessarily all, would recognize. Sorry if you considered it original intelligence, but I cannot claim it. It was one of your own.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News