Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (94435)	9/11/2012 12:43:33 PM
From: bart13	7 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217946

Overall, I sure don't envy your position. It's the main reason I never started a blog with commenting allowed on my site. There's just plain too many value judgments and no matter what is done - nothing or banning or censoring or even just expressing an opinion means that some will think you're wrong. With MQ though, I know exactly what he is and does and has done for years. Sometimes I just sort of yank his chain on his more outrageous or wrong points, or his arrogance, or even his attempts to stir things up. And yes, he does post interesting views now & then too. Partly I do it because I want to see his "creativity" in dodging various points (it's a bit of odd art form), partly because it's a bit of fun on a boring day, and partly to illustrate (for those who may not see it) his clever use of the various bogus debating "tools" like CEOs or bank(st)ers or politicians etc. use. Bottom line, I'll drop the current one. It has obviously outlived its time and place. And for an attempt at socially redeeming value, an update on my M3 reconstruction which has probably bottomed. My Consumer Purchasing Power Index (CPPI), which is running counter trend to both CPI-U and Shadowstats inflation measures, but is in line with what PMs are doing. Lastly, CPI-U vs. estimated SGS-CPI and CPI-U.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (94435)	9/13/2012 7:04:35 PM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217946

Indeed I do TJ. Please ban them! They are lowering the tone to rapist paedophile gutter status [see metacomet's post and Paul's chuckling endorsement]. < Perhaps Mq also understands where I am coming from and how i am stance-d.> It is even in the category of libel since I am an actual person whereas those wimpy hiding cowards are not. You wouldn't want to encourage libel would you? Brasco should probably take a break too. It's interesting to see how childish sandpit style they can be. Like Pavlov's dogs, they drool at the ringing of a bell. Meanwhile, caution on gold going into 31 Dec 2012 because QE I II III ... MLCXXX [some x-rated number] are built into my official sooth. You can coast from here as the 31 Dec 2012 $1727 number for gold includes all information from known known to unknown unknown, including the latest QE. Mqurice