Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Quickdraw who wrote (7894)	11/30/1997 1:18:00 PM
From: Phil Jones	Respond to of 14627

Rick, I too feel optimism on PFG. After reading the RoB article, it was pretty clear that CMS is four-square behind pushing PFG - come hell or high water. With big cash behind the company and her personally, and having read her background, I see PFG as being able to weather the storm better than most of the junior golds. I'm with you about it turning upward soon.

To: Quickdraw who wrote (7894)	11/30/1997 4:20:00 PM
From: Quinn	Respond to of 14627

Nice to see you back again Rick-I am a fan. I would agree the TSE listing should happen in December seing that their approval by the TSE was given on the date of the AGM. Ironic? I have been a severe critic of CMS and her 'team' but also remain to be convinced of her management expertise. I hope, with all sincerity, I am wrong. There are a lot of analysts here in Toronto that are watching. I, however, am 100% convinced that the future of PFG is great+, or I would have sold and not been posting. This company is the conundrum of all time. I guess that what keeps me interested. All the shareholders are looking at a realistic share price of $6-7 if there was no game playing by Management. Why?? Who knows? We are all suffering at $1.05, absolutley unbelievable considering the siver/gold values and that Barrick are still there, in terrible times, drilling and spending.