Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (199621)	9/12/2012 5:46:00 PM
From: hawkeyefan	Respond to of 209892

I tend to agree. Too bad for you. -g- I think we completed a double zigzag off this morning's high. Only thing that makes sense. A zigzag fits a "ii" well. This is not what I expected for this time frame but I won't argue. We will know soon.

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (199621)	9/12/2012 6:08:48 PM
From: kckip	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Thoughts on a potential inverse H&S for IBM since May? MM would be around 220-221 if it qualifies.

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (199621)	9/12/2012 8:06:45 PM
From: hawkeyefan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 209892

Just to throw out something a little different. Could we already be in your bigger 4? It could have started early last Friday or early Monday. The low early Tuesday would have to be the "a" and now we are working on an abc x abc for the "b". It just needs to finish the second "c" up yet. Then a bigger "c" down to match the "a". All this could be a bigger "A" since this is a 4. I am just posting this in case we see a five waver down tomorrow after an initial rally. I just like to be prepared. I don't like seeing something I wasn't expecting or didn't consider beforehand. This post might be all for naught.