Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alias Shrugged who wrote (3995)	11/30/1997 3:11:00 PM
From: Iceberg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

>Is there a school of TA that looks at where a stock "should" be trading based upon eps and eps growth, and then tries to identify how much of the stock price is "fluff" that could easily be squeezed out? Mike, IMO, TA doesn't incorporate "shoulds" and "fluffs". If there were such a thing as you described, it would cease to be TA. It would also cease to be FA. It would become some sort of nontraditional hybrid. Having said that, what you suggest needs to be done [if it hasn't already]...regardless of the labels that might be applied. >And don't ever try to agitate me again! Is this a threat? Man, I'm justa shakin' in my boots. <g> Ice