Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (78833)	9/18/2012 7:27:56 PM
From: lorne	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

GZ...If America loses in this next election and the creature cheats his way back into the White House is this likely to happen?? Top Muslim calls for U.N. to end free speech Claims violence over film proof constitutional protection 'benefits no one' by Drew Zahn Tuesday, September 18, 2012 wnd.com One of the world’s most influential Muslims is now calling on the United Nations – in light of the YouTube movie blamed for violent protests across the Mideast – to impose international restrictions on free speech, criminalizing any statement that impugns Islam. Sheikh Abdullah Bin Bayyah, a professor at King Abdul Aziz University in Saudi Arabia, is a member of several international organizations, including the Centre for Studying the Aims of Sharia in the U.K., as well as serving as the vice chairman of the International Union of Muslim Scholars. The Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre ranked bin Bayyah No. 31 on its list of the 500 most influential Muslims in the world for 2011. In a public declaration issued to several Islamic bodies, including the All Dulles Area Muslim Society, one of the largest Muslim mosques in the D.C. metro area and the U.S., bin Bayyah called upon “people of reason and understanding” to put a legal stop to statements that would offend Muslims and thereby threaten world peace. “We ask everyone to ponder the ramifications of provoking the feelings of over one billion people by a small party of people who desires not to seek peace nor fraternity between members of humanity,” bin Bayyah wrote. “This poses a threat to world peace with no tangible benefit realized. Is it not necessary in today’s world for the United Nations to issue a resolution criminalizing the impingement of religious symbols? We request all religious and political authorities, as well as people of reason to join us in putting a stop to this futility that benefits no one.” Bin Bayyah’s statement was titled a “Declaration Regarding the Offensive Video to Muslims,” a clear reference to the YouTube film, “Innocence of Muslims,” which has been widely – if controversially – blamed for inciting riots against embassies in the Middle East and the resulting death of four U.S. diplomats. The Obama administration had similarly asked Google, the parent company of YouTube, to review whether “Innocence of Muslims” violates its terms-of-use policies. Thus far, Google has refused to remove the video from YouTube, though it blocked access in some sensitive countries. Pundits from a wide spectrum of news outlets have agreed the video is protected by free speech rights in the U.S. Bin Bayyah’s statement continued, condemning the embassy attacks in the Middle East: “We implore you not to inflict violence upon anyone, whether foreign delegations or otherwise. You should not destroy property or flout the values and cherished principles that you defend, as attacking innocents, killing foreign diplomats and ambassadors contravenes religious and moral principles before it contravenes political ones.” Nonetheless, bin Bayyah reiterated the U.S. should make videos like “Innocence of Muslims” illegal, even while he claimed to back “free speech.” “To our Western neighbors … we are extremely concerned with a small active minority in your countries that seeks to perpetuate a state of conflict and war,” bin Bayyah wrote. “We estimate that such objectives do not serve the general interest. Therefore, it is our hope that you reconsider and criminalize the denigration of religious symbols, as such provocations do not serve the principles of free speech, principles that you and us both seek to uphold.” In a WND commentary, Diana West discussed other leading Muslims’ attempts to criminalize criticism of Islam. “Mohamed Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood president of Egypt (who denies that al-Qaida attacked the U.S. on 9/11, by the way), directed the Egyptian Embassy in Washington to ‘take legal action’ against the movie’s producers,” West writes. “Morsi doesn’t seem to understand First Amendment protections.” West continued, “Egyptian Prime Minister Hisham Qandil asked for similar action ‘within the framework of international charters that criminalize acts that stir strife on the basis of race, color or religion.’ This is a direct appeal to hold Americans accountable to the U.N. blasphemy resolution Hillary Clinton, along with the Islamic bloc, has championed, despite its repressive controls on free speech.” West was referring a “defamation against religion” resolution the Organization of Islamic Cooperation has been pushing at the U.N. every year since 1999. Last year, Clinton worked with the OIC to pass a revised version, Resolution 16/18, which included both the usual condemnation of defaming speech and a paragraph affirming “the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression” plays in “strengthening democracy.” Critics of the defamation resolutions fear they could be used to outlaw valid and critical scrutiny of Islamic teachings, as some OIC states do through controversial blasphemy laws at home. The Clinton compromise version, though still roundly criticized, enjoyed more popularity at the U.N. itself and was adopted by consensus.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (78833)	9/18/2012 7:46:46 PM
From: John	5 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

Millions of normal Americans are beyond sick of the piece-of-$hit ******. He belongs in Africa where he was born, which is also where the rest of his family resides when they aren't illegally invading the United States or committing sexual felonies in North America and the UK. Barack Hussein Obama, a.k.a. Muslim Barry Soetoro, is a fraudulent illegal alien African Muslim and a homosexual. I seriously doubt he is even married to that stupid, racist wench that he parades around with. The 96 percent of hypenated-Africans who voted for and still support that piece-of-ape-$hit also belong in Africa, and the 42 percent of Whites who voted for him belong in insane asylums. The two-thirds of illegal Mestizos who support him belong back in Mexico in the filthy squalor they created and from which they came. America could be a nice country again if we could simply vote correctly and permanently get rid of all of the filth and trash infecting and polluting our nation. The truth of the matter is that the longer this intolerable situation persists, the more likely it becomes that a figure far worse than Hitler will ultimately arise and permanently remedy the demographic problems America faces. It's a well-known and well-established fact that America was a great country when it was comprised of over 90 percent Christian Whites. The more the demographics morph to resemble Africa and Mexico, the worse the country becomes. Everyone knows that those places are literally filthy thrid-world sewers. No sane or civilized person would ever want to live in either place. Africa and Mexico are filthy sewer holes because of the uncivilized filth that lives there, not the climate or terrain. People define a country, and the more America comes to resemble like Africa and Mexico, rather than Northern Europe, the worse our country becomes. It's just a fact, and I do not give a damn if anyone considers that racism or not. If they cannot face the truth, they may as well either commit suicide or move to Africa or Mexico to make a statement for those filthy rat hole countries. -ng- I do not think America will improve, because the volume of imbeciles, undesirables, and brainwashed sub-human fools is now much greater than responsible, intelligent human beings.