Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (131919)	9/21/2012 8:38:18 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Hi Skeeter Bug; Re: "But why would the French need to study something you claimed was proven safe already?" Same reason that you evacuate a building when some moron pulls the fire alarm. The dogs bark and the caravan keeps right on moving. -- Carl

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (131919)	9/21/2012 8:43:14 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Hi Skeeter Bug; Re: "Please be specific when you say Seralini published faulty papers in the past. Nobody can read your mind and nobody serious is going to just trust you. Otherwise, this is just more logical fallacy - in this case ad hominem. It is a fallacy for a reason - it isn't rational thinking. I'm into rational thinking - so try to up your game and actually express yourself outside of logical fallacy." Unless a reader is a complete moron, they can find the various Seralini papers and their numerous rebuttals themselves. For you, I have no reason to write up links, what's the point? If someone else asks I'll do it. Or read the rebuttal in Forbes linked in a couple posts back. -- Carl