SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wildcat who wrote (28753)11/30/1997 8:47:00 PM
From: O. H. Rundell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Wildcat,

Seems unlikely to be true. Wouldn't we have to assume that AuRIC was working without a contract, perhaps on a spec basis. Surely IPM would have had a contract that said something like "we will pay you $x/month for a maximum of y months to develop a reliable modified fire assay". Surely IPM mgt wouldn't have left themselves open to an unlimited payment.

O. H.



To: Wildcat who wrote (28753)12/1/1997 9:16:00 AM
From: kimberley  Respond to of 35569
 
Wildcat,

<<I have seen the similar "info" that if repeated enough becomes believable. I am not saying this is false, but, I require source proof.>>

This past summer I was having this problem... it was hard to distinguish what was rumor and what was fact. I started printing out all PR's and keeping them as reference... helped a great deal. just a thought.

best,
kim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News