SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (28357)9/22/2012 11:52:03 AM
From: gamesmistress2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 85487
 
Huntsman was the only guy who could beat Obama.

I have no idea why you would say that. He was in and out of the Presidential primaries so fast he made little impression nationally.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (28357)9/22/2012 11:55:05 AM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
If Huntsman were the nominee, liberals would be saying the same things about him they're saying about Romney.

He's a Mormon from a rich family too.

The only reason liberals pretend to like Huntsman is because Huntsman stupidly ran for the Republican nomination by attacking conservatives.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (28357)9/22/2012 1:18:53 PM
From: bentway1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Romney is a serial loser only elevated to being the candidate by the weakest (R) field in my lifetime. They'll remember that none of them even LIKED him after he loses yet again.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (28357)9/22/2012 4:47:58 PM
From: Little Joe  Respond to of 85487
 
Yes it was a weak field, especially considering the alternatives, but the election is close, so I guess the incumbant is not so great.
lj


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News