Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Amati investors -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Piper who wrote (29501)	12/1/1997 2:47:00 AM
From: pat mudge	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31386

[Filings] <<<I know this is a moot point but whatever happened to the S4 filing that Westell was suppose to come out with over a month ago before the TI swoop? The fact that it didn't come out should have been a flag that something was amiss. I was hoping to get some insights from the S4 since it was to give details about the negotiations.>>> It was suppposed to come out at the same time as the 10-D (or whatever it was called) and then the attorneys discovered they could bring it out at the same time as the prospectus --- at the end of the 30-day SEC period. When TI came in with their offer, everything changed. Will we ever see the S-4? I have no idea. But if you get a copy, let me know. I'd sell my first-born to see what's in it. Have you read the TI document? I waded through it this week-end. Nothing revolutionary. The big guys get their options protected, there's a backout fee of $8M if Amati wants out, and all the details of employment and so on are outlined. No where does it say disgruntled shareholders can petition to have their settlement in shares rather than cash. Drat! Pat