Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Epic EAS.v (formerly Epic ERB.v and Safari SIR.v) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CLK who wrote (1252)	12/1/1997 9:15:00 AM
From: paul s.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3335

CLK: Yes options were exercised during these selling sprees, coincidently for the same number of shares sold at market. However, I disagree that this is any form of shrewd market playing...if the stock is at 2.3 and I can execise options for .83, not much thought required to make that no-brainer... I have no fundamental issue with him making money on his company, but there are many presidents of companies that will not sell in these cases because they know full well that they are selling their paper to investors in their company that will become near worthless when his volume of selling pushes the price back down. I know, that the VSE game... <<These are stocks you should never chase imho>> Agreed...but somebody has to chase for those that bought at .45 to make money :-) Anyway, I've said enough about this topic already...I'll leave the thread to talk about this play---if they can find any info to talk about:-) paul just one man's opinion...quite frankly I hope this one works out...its a great story for that area of the U.S.