SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (24741)10/1/2012 6:01:35 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
I don't see how employees are double taxed at all -- they receive their money it is taxed and that's that.

Shareholders receive their money and it's taxed and that's that, no?

Bear in mind that I know nothing about corporate income taxes. Given that perspective, it makes sense on a superficial level that employees get income from corporations and shareholders get income from corporations. Those corporations pay income tax. So when either the shareholder or the employee pays income tax on that income, that could be construed as a double tax on each of them. It's not obvious to me why it would be a double tax for one and not the other.

Edit: I see that Tim just explained the difference.



To: i-node who wrote (24741)10/5/2012 9:14:34 AM
From: Peter Dierks1 Recommendation  Respond to of 42652
 
I have noticed a lack of posts here from the left. Do you suspect as I do that after Governor Romney wins they will be all over here saying that you can't end their entitlement?