To: Sr K who wrote (122285 ) 10/2/2012 10:22:53 PM From: RetiredNow Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 149317 Quite possibly, but Romney most definitely let it be known he didn't like what Bernanke was doing. If he's had to pull back on that, because it wasn't popular, it doesn't matter, because I know how Romney really feels on the issue now. With Obama, I know he like the Bernanke policies and he'll continue to give Bernanke a free reign. So for me, this is a very clear choice between the two candidates. I know a lot about economics, and based on that knowledge, I believe Bernanke is probably the most dangerous man alive today. He is the single largest threat to our national security. History is replete with stories of fallen kingdoms whose fall was preceded by currency debasement. It is a one way path and we've embarked on it. Keynes himself said it better than anyone else. He would have been appalled at Bernanke's actions, but Democrats have taken Keynes' teachings and implemented them in the most corrupt and destined to fail ways, and have embraced Bernanke's endless money printing, believing it is a path to prosperity. Keynes said only one man in a million could diagnose how destructive currency debasement can be. I'm your one man in a million and I've been shouting about it on this thread for awhile now. You'd do well to listen. Bernanke is not your savior. Rather, he is the single most dangerous man in the USA, with the power to destroy this country faster than anyone else on earth. Here's Keynes quote:"Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth. Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become 'profiteers,' who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose." en.wikiquote.org