SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (122349)10/3/2012 11:19:14 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Internals must show this race is winnable.

AZ-Sen: Rich Carmona fans, your wait is over: Multiple media outlets are reporting that the DSCC is going up with their first ad buy on his behalf starting this week, for a total of $526K. Carmona, of course, is the Bush-era surgeon general who was recruited by Democrats in an attempt to pick up this GOP-held seat left open by the retiring Jon Kyl. There hasn't been a ton of polling here, but of late, it's tended to show Carmona in a surprisingly close race with Republican Rep. Jeff Flake. And based on this move, you have to figure the DSCC's own internals look at least as good. Of course, this is only a single week's worth of ads (and we haven't seen the spot yet), but a pickup here for Team Blue would be amazing.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (122349)10/3/2012 2:27:58 PM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh  Respond to of 149317
 
Not all religious charities do that. Ones I've been involved with ask nothing about religion, they deliver food and other need things to people in need. Some do that, but it's too broad a brush to say that's what religious charities do.

As to people voting on social issues, that cuts both ways. As a lesbian, many people would be shocked if I voted R rather than D, because to them the most important issue to me should be the treatment of glbts by the parties. But if it's a poor white, the same people often say... how can that person not vote their economic interest. What reasons a person has for casting their vote is their concern, not of anyone else to say what their most important interest should be.

In the days before SS and Medicare, giving to a church for it to be distributed to those in need was an important part of the social fabric. Yes, many church leaders have misused that money over the centuries, but that doesn't take fully away the idea of the action.