Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145322)	10/10/2012 11:51:11 AM
From: d[-_-]b	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224718

America has come to recognize Obama as their greatest problem - they will soon have a chance to fix the problem.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145322)	10/10/2012 11:57:38 AM
From: DanDerr	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224718

LOL! Spin, Kenneth, Spin...

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145322)

10/10/2012 11:59:08 AM

From: longnshort

2 Recommendations Respond to of 224718

....... “Take a second and try to think of a single argument the modern liberal offers regarding any issue that doesn’t consist in its entirety of, ‘We’re right because our grandiose self esteem tells us we’re morally and intellectually superior and anyone who disagrees with us is A) stupid, B) bigoted, C) phobic or D) greedy.’ The truth is you can’t name one not one.” Expand on that a bit. It’s true. I want your readers to take a second and name an issue where the Democrat argues in favor of what it is he believes, why his policy is good, why it works, how it will work, how it will be paid for, and where it’s been tried before and succeeded. You never hear that argument. The only argument you ever hear is if you oppose a their healthcare scheme, you want to push granny over the cliff. If you support an anti-illegal immigration bill, it’s because you hate Mexicans. If you don’t agree with them on abortion on demand, paid for by the citizens, then you are in a war on women. Name an issue in which the Democrats make an affirmative argument to explain why their position is better. You cannot name a single one, not one.
.........
rightwingnews.com

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145322)	10/10/2012 12:01:54 PM
From: longnshort	4 Recommendations Respond to of 224718

New O’Keefe video: Obama campaign staffer caught helping activist vote twice Read more: dailycaller.com Videographer James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas caught an official for President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign helping who she thought was an Obama supporter set herself up to vote more than once in November. Stephanie Caballero is the regional field director for Obama’s Organizing For America in Houston, Texas. Federal Election Commission documents show, according to Project Veritas, that Caballero is a “salaried employee of the DNC [Democratic National Committee].” Caballero is caught on camera helping the young woman try to vote in Florida and Texas in the upcoming election. Read more: dailycaller.com

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145322)	10/10/2012 4:00:48 PM
From: Paul V.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 224718

Kenneth, I agree that Obama has improved the conditions and we are better than when he took office with two wars off budget, Wall Street and the lending institutions crashing, along with automobile manufacturing. Additionally, the infrastructure was decaying, and jobs were being eliminated due to robotics and computerization. There were/are displaced workers without the skills to fill these numerous high skilled jobs. Consequently, the principles of capitalization sent corporation moving to the countries where capitalization principles of "maximizing the profits for the stockholders," works. Naturally, the current administration, Obama, and his advisors had to plug the financial and other hemorrhage by "priming the pump" to keep the US from going into a depression. Inflation, economically, at times is the best of two evils during any economic collapse if there is a choice only between the two judgements. Do we really want rebellions like what is taking place in Greece where there many be killings and rioting in the streets and possible terrorism impacting the US. I think not! Others may say, "Bring it on!!!" However, those expressing such a vision have no idea what type of violence can result when individuals existence is based on where, "the law of jungle prevails." Even my town of approximately 30 K has seen a tremendous jump of crime. Just think what can occur in larger metro areas! We have to remember that within a technological information age many unemployed individuals will never be re-employed regardless of who is President, since their skill sets are obsolete, they do not have the financial resources to obtain or update their skill sets, and/or are just to old to perform heavy labor. Others I see have tried to play it safe with their money in CD's and are using their principal to live, while others who are invested in the market have made tremendous amounts off the markets. PS Did any of those on this site see "PBS Frontline," last night, 8-10 pm, CST, comparing OBama's upbringing with Romney's? It was a real contrast. If some saw the showing what was your thoughts of the TV production? You might be able to see the program on the computer.