SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DanDerr who wrote (512762)10/10/2012 10:17:01 PM
From: LindyBill2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794156
 
Lamb is an inept woman

I wished she had been asked when testifying "who above you did you have conversations about on the subject of the security of the Benghazi?" Somebody told her to hold the security down, IMO.

This sure sounds like the Oval Office people had put the word out to keep security down in Libya.



To: DanDerr who wrote (512762)10/10/2012 11:02:00 PM
From: t4texas2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794156
 
i noticed c-span is running the entire bengazi attack congressional hearing now. it will be on until about 1 am et. i am recording the hearing, and i will go over it each time i see ms. lamb on camera. i want to compare what i hear/see with what brett bair said she said today. if she was really on the phone with the consulate for about the six hours, she knows exactly what was going on in realtime. clearly she would have told her superiors (and others) what happened in lots of details. she did not need to hear from "intelligence" to know what happened.

this ambassador kennedy guy says he does not know anything from sept 11 until sept 16 other than what ambassador rice said. if i suspend my disbelief, i suppose he never heard from ms. lamb about her consulate-under-attack phone conversation during the six hour raid. i have fired at least two managers who worked for me who acted far, far less dumb than kennedy.



To: DanDerr who wrote (512762)10/11/2012 4:15:56 AM
From: t4texas2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794156
 
rep. james lankford, oklahoma, asked charlene lamb the question about where she was on september 11, 2012. she said she was in the washington command center, and she was in almost constant telephone contact with the bengazi consulate under fire from the beginning until the end of the fire fight. she was experiencing all this contact with the consulate in realtime. she is not the brightest bulb in the building, but she certainly could give testimony about the six hours she was in contact with the consulate. she certainly provided her superiors, the fbi, and other intelligence people plenty of information about what the bengazi consulate people under fire said and did. from the beginning she knew it was a terrorist attack, but she would not say that.

during the hearing a 50 minute video taking at the bengazi consulate on september 11th was yet to be turned over to the committee, and ambassador kennedy would not say who or what agency has the video. chairman issa said the fbi does not have the video and he was told by the fbi the video was not needed. so issa wants to see the video, but no one will tell him what agency of govt. has the video. i assume the white house has the video.