SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145467)10/11/2012 2:19:37 PM
From: lorne6 Recommendations  Respond to of 224777
 
Obama’s Former Classmate: ‘He Told Us That His Father Was an Indonesian King,‘ That ’He Was a Prince’ & ‘Would Be a Ruler’
Posted on October 10, 2012
Billy Hallowell
theblaze.com


This week, PBS’s “Frontline” published the transcript from a June 27, 2012 interview with Kristen Caldwell, a woman who grew up with President Barack Obama and attended the Punahou School with him in Honolulu, Hawaii. Among other claims, she told PBS that, as a young child, Obama told his classmates that he was Kenyan royalty or an Indonesian prince — fascinating claims that she discussed in great detail.

The former classmate, who referred to Obama as “Barry” throughout the interview (the name she claims his classmates called him), said that she believes Obama was at the prestigious school on scholarship. Like other kids who were attending on reduced admission, he likely worked at the tennis courts on campus — a location where the two frequently hung out.

During the interview, she described Obama’s physical appearance and his frequent purported embellishment of his background.

“I can picture him as this slightly — “chubby” is too strong, but rounded, short little guy, Barry Obama,” Caldwell said. “And he told us that his father was an Indonesian king and that he was a prince, and after he finished school he was going to go back, and he would be a ruler in Indonesia.”

Obama must have been charismatic even then, as his former classmate said the following about his wild claims: “I absolutely believed him.” Caldwell also said she heard that Obama once told his fifth-grade class that he was Kenyan royalty. While she didn’t hear this directly — and it was years later that the story made its way to her — Obama’s claim to be a prince was something she experienced directly.

“My sister and I remember very clearly that he was an Indonesian prince and that he would be going back there,” she continued. “So there was some reference to where he had come from, and the understanding was his family was there.”

Caldwell and Obama were purportedly close, seeing as her father allegedly drove him home from the tennis courts on rainy days. Additionally, she claims that they spent a great deal of time hanging out together both during the school year and throughout the summer each year – however, she didn’t seem to know intimate details about his background.

As far as the embellished stories about his father and stature, PBS asked Caldwell why she believes Obama told such tall tales.

The former classmate said that she believes insecurity was the central underpinning of his stories about being royalty and one-day returning to Indonesia to assume the throne. After living in Hawaii until he was six, moving in Indonesia from six until age 10 and then arriving back in the state, once again, she said she could understand why he felt the need to compensate.

“I would think he would have felt very, very fish-out-of-water, very uncomfortable, and like anybody, he’d have to have a little bit of bravado to mask the insecurities,” Caldwell continued.

In a subsequent question, PBS asked if Caldwell noticed anything special about Obama during the time she spent with him. Considering that he grew up to become the leader of the free world, the outlet was curious to know if he exuded confidence and other such sentiment that pointed to a bright future ahead. While highlighting the fact that Punahou was filled with brilliant and talented children — and that getting into the school required that one fit these categories — she said, “to me he was a normal kid.”

“He didn’t seem outstanding academically or athletically or any other way. To me he seemed normal,” she continued.

While these claims are certainly odd, children often role-play and use their imaginations. It’s entirely possible this is what was at play. Either way, these are some intriguing claims to say the least. Read the transcript from “Frontline’s” entire interview with Kristen Caldwell here.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145467)10/11/2012 2:19:44 PM
From: JakeStraw4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224777
 



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145467)10/11/2012 3:55:47 PM
From: lorne1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224777
 


obama desperate?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145467)10/11/2012 4:30:00 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224777
 

Why Jobless Claims May Not Be as Good as Market ThinksBy Kelly Evans | CNBC – 4 hours ago on Twitter








For the second time in a week, a government unemployment report is sowing confusion-and may not be as positive as the markets think.



First it was last Friday's August payrolls report, which showed an unexpectedly large drop in the unemployment rate, that spurred confusion (and conspiracy theories). Now, a sharp drop in the pace of new jobless claims has also left people scratching their heads.

The Labor Department on Thursday said the number of people filing jobless claims last week dropped by a seasonally adjusted 30,000-a pretty sharp decline, and one that left the total number of filings at a four-year low of 339,000.

Financial markets immediately rallied on the news.

(More From CNBC: Stocks Rise After Jobless Claims Hit 4-Year Low)



While the government didn't note any unusual factors in the release itself, a Labor Department official did tell news agencies covering the release about a quirk which partly accounted for the larger-than-expected drop.



As Dow Jones reported: "A Labor Department economist said one large state didn't report additional quarterly figures as expected, accounting for a substantial part of the decrease."

The wording of that statement, along with the accompanying headlines, left the impression that one major state didn't turn in its figures.

Here's what actually happened. The state did report weekly jobless claims but did not process and report its quarterly claims number (when many people have to reapply for benefits for technical reasons as opposed to being newly laid off). As a result, there wasn't the expected spike in claims that normally happens at the start of the quarter.

It is unclear why that happened or how unusual that is. What is clear is that the expected spike in claims around the start of each quarter was smaller this time than usual. Coupled with the seasonal adjustment (that expected a bigger increase), that pushed down the headline figure.

(More From CNBC: The 12 Most Underrated US Jobs in 2012)

In other words, the drop of 30,000 last week had more to do with the lack of expected re-filings at the start of the fourth quarter than with any particular improvement in labor market conditions.

That also means that the decline which usually follows the spike won't be as pronounced this time around, so the headline tally of jobless claims is likely to rebound next week.

All told, these two weeks' worth of jobless claims will end up being more noise than signal. That may frustrate those who follow the series closely for clues into the health of the U.S. labor market. Coupled with last week's payrolls report, it is also likely to fuel perception that labor market figures in general can't be trusted.

The Labor Department appears to have had little choice in this matter, however; it couldn't estimate what the one large state would or should have reported. Still, it may have been able to avoid more confusion had it more clearly articulated that in its weekly press release.

And now, there is one state's labor department with plenty of explaining to



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145467)10/11/2012 5:14:58 PM
From: DanDerr5 Recommendations  Respond to of 224777
 
Guess you missed this, Kenneth! Eh, say what!!

Swing States
Release Date

Obama

Romney

NET

October 11, 2012

48

49

Romney +1

October 10, 2012

47

49

Romney +2

October 9, 2012

47

49

Romney +2

October 8, 2012

49

47

Obama +2

October 7, 2012

49

47

Obama +2

October 6, 2012

49

46

Obama +3

October 5, 2012

50

45

Obama +5

October 4, 2012

51

45

Obama +6

October 3, 2012

50

45

Obama +5

October 2, 2012

50

45

Obama +5

October 1, 2012

51

45

Obama +6




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145467)10/11/2012 9:38:48 PM
From: tonto4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224777
 
Biden laughs about our economy...in fact he can't stop laughing about any of the problems.
He is acting and doing a poor job of that...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145467)10/12/2012 6:55:55 AM
From: lorne2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224777
 
Times/Bay News 9/Herald exclusive Florida poll: Romney 51, Obama 44

By Adam C. Smith, Times Political Editor
Posted: Oct 11, 2012
tampabay.com

Barack Obama's lackluster debate performance last week has dramatically altered the presidential race in Florida, with Mitt Romney opening up a decisive 7 percentage point lead, according to a new Tampa Bay Times/Bay News 9/Miami Herald poll.

The survey conducted this week found 51 percent of likely Florida voters supporting Romney, 44 percent backing Obama and 4 percent undecided. That's a major shift from a month ago when the same poll showed Obama leading 48 percent to 47 percent — and a direct result of what Obama himself called a "bad night" at the first debate.

The debate prompted 5 percent of previously undecided voters and 2 percent of Obama backers to move to Romney. Another 2 percent of Obama supporters said they are now undecided because of the debate.

"There's no question in my mind that debate made people stand up and pay attention, and it really wiped away any questions people had about Romney, whether they were undecided or soft for Obama," said Brad Coker of Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, which conducted the poll for the Times and its media partners.

Across the board, from who is better suited to improve the economy, to who will protect Medicare, to looking out for the middle-class, to handling foreign policy, likely Florida voters now favor the former Massachusetts governor over the president.

"It's a very big shift since the debate, and where the shifts are taking place are very, very interesting because they are the types of shifts you see in Florida when something starts to break one way or another," said Coker, likening it to when Ronald Reagan shot past Jimmy Carter in 1980.

Take Tampa Bay, the battleground region that invariably mirrors statewide results. A month ago, Obama had a 4 percentage point lead in Tampa Bay. This week, Romney led by 8 percent, 52 to 44. In Central Florida, Romney now leads by 6 points.

Likewise, Obama's lead among likely women voters in Florida fell from 15 percentage points last month to just 2 points, 49 percent for Obama and 47 percent for Romney.

Obama's once 11 point lead among likely independent voters had cascaded into a 13 point lead for Romney this week, 52 percent to 39 percent.

The poll found little change among Florida youngest voters, 18-34, or oldest voters, 65 and up. But those ages 35 to 64, who had been evenly divided a month ago, moved dramatically to the Republican nominee. Romney now has a nine point lead among voters age 35-49 and a 15 point lead among those between 50 and 64.

Especially ominous were the numbers for Hispanic voters, a demographic where the Obama campaign is banking on an advantage of at least 15 percentage points. The poll showed 44 percent of likely Hispanic voters favoring Obama and 46 for Romney, though the margin of error is higher with that smaller group of voters.

"We ran away from other countries in search of a more traditional United States," said Coral Gables resident Mary Gonzalez, who immigrated from Venezuela. "I think with the current president, the United States moves to (the left). And with Romney, I believe he can return the United States to its traditional course."

The bottom line? Obama appears to be in serious trouble in America's biggest battleground state. He has two debates and 25 days to turn it around, but the poll points to a race that had been close and stable for months shifting significantly toward the Republican nominee.

"You cant say it's over, but if nothing changes — no major gaffes, no big stories that come out of nowhere, relatively equal debate performances where nobody really outdoes the other — I think Florida is going to fall into the Romney column," Coker said. "I think once voters fall off of Obama it's going to be harder for Obama to bring them em back."

The telephone survey of 800 registered Florida voters — all likely to vote in the November election — was conducted Oct. 8-10 for the Tampa Bay Times, Bay News 9, Miami Herald, El Nuevo Herald and Central Florida News 13. The poll, which included respondents using land-lines and cell phones, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

Not all the polling news was bleak for Obama Thursday. An Oct. 7-9 NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist Florida poll found significantly different results, with Obama leading Romney among likely Florida voters 48 percent to 47 percent, and well ahead of Romney among women. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percent.

A couple differences between the Marist poll and Mason-Dixon: Mason-Dixon, which has been polling in Florida for 28 years, uses a survey sample based on people's voter actual registration to match the electorate in Florida, while Marist uses a sample based on whether people say they consider themselves a Republican, Democrat or independent. About 20 percent of the likely voters in the Marist poll were Hispanic, while 13 percent were Hispanic in the Mason-Dixon poll, more in line with the Florida voting patterns. Marist had Obama leading among Hispanics 47 percent to 45 percent.

The average of recent Florida polls compiled by RealClearPolitics, without the latest Times poll included, shows a dead even race, 47.5 percent for Romney and 47.5 percent for Obama.

The Times poll "is just not rooted in reality," senior Obama adviser David Plouffe said Thursday. "We got 57 percent of the Latino vote, according to exit (polls) last time. We think we'll probably push 60 or above this time."

Plouffe told the Times the Obama campaign believes it leads in Florida by a percentage point or two and that it's floor of support in the state is at least 47 percent: "It's impossible for us to be at 44 in Florida."

But even fans of Obama are shaking their heads about his debate last week.

North Port resident Virginia Leonard, 92 is a registered Republican who voted for McCain four years ago, but is firmly in Obama's camp this time. Still, she wondered if Obama had been drugged he was so lethargic in the debate.

Democrat Dora Williams, a 71-year-old St. Petersburg retiree, also supports Obama but was taken aback by the debate.

"I was like, 'Ooh, why didn't he speak up?' But he was caught by surprise so I understand that," she said. "When somebody is lying to your face, you can be caught off guard."

Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson appears to be a non-factor in Florida, with just 1 percent backing him or any other third party candidate.

Florida voters were closely divided on the president's job performance last month, but this week the poll found 54 percent disapprove of his performance and 44 percent approve. Forty five percent have a favorable view of Obama and 49 percent an unfavorable view, while 50 percent have a favorable view of Romney and only 38 percent an unfavorable view.

Fifty four percent see the country heading on the wrong track and 41 percent say it's on the right track. Forty four percent say they are better off today than four years ago and 50 percent said they're not.

"This man, Obama, has done little, but he has done something. Also keep in mind that the previous president left the country in bad shape, and the current president has not had enough time to fix things. We have to give him more time to fix things right," said Lorenzo Ruiz, 84, of Miami.

But on key questions Romney has the advantage:

• Who do you trust more to improve the economy? Romney 50 percent, Obama 44 percent.

• Who do you trust more on foreign policy? Romney 49 percent, Obama 46 percent.

• Who do you trust more to look out for the middle class? Romney 50 percent, Obama 47 percent.

• Who do you consider more trustworthy to lead the nation? Romney 51 percent, Obama 46 percent.

• Whose plans are more likely to do more long-term harm to Medicare? Obama 54 percent, Romney 40 percent.

"I think Medicare as we know it will cease to exist because its not sustainable for the future. We do need to have change in the way it's handled. Medicare and Social Security are both going to have to change," said Ron Govin, a 72-year-old Republican from Temple Terrace, a Romney supporter who watched the debate with interest.

"I thought Romney presented some pretty defendable decisions that indicated what he would do. Contrary to that, I thought the president was almost like he wasn't there in his response. Almost like it was kind of new to him," Govin said.

Times/Herald staff writers Brittany Alana Davis, Tia Mitchell and Al Chardy contributed to this report. Contact Adam C. Smith at asmith@tampabay.com.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145467)10/12/2012 7:00:38 AM
From: lorne2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224777
 
Media Hits Biden: 'Stop Smirking!' 'Weird,' 'Jerk'
breitbart.com

We're about thirty minutes into the debate and already Vide President Joe Biden is receiveing pretty tough reviews for his bizarre smiling and smirking as debate moderator Martha Raddatz talks about issues as serious as Iran getting a nuclear weapon.

These aren't exactly conservative media types, either.

CNN's Piers Morgan tweeted:

Piers Morgan?
@piersmorgan

Joe, seriously, STOP SMIRKING. This is serious stuff. Be Vice-Presidential. #PMTdebate

11 Oct 12 Reply
Retweet
Favorit
......................................................................

The Daily Beast's Kirsten Powers also isn't impressed:

kirsten powers?
@kirstenpowers10

Biden laughing while Martha talks about Iran getting the bomb is just weird.
......................................................................

11 Oct 12 Reply
Retweet
Favorite

What's funny, Mr. Vice President? It only gets worse... The Washington Post's Erik Wemple:

ErikWemple@ErikWemple
.......................................................................................................

Biden really pushing it with his interruptions.#vpdebate

11 Oct 12 Reply
Retweet
Favorite

Philip Klein@philipaklein
................................................................................................................

If Biden's strategy was to come off like a complete jerk, he's succeeding brilliantly.

11 Oct 12 Reply
Retweet
Favorite




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145467)10/12/2012 7:22:35 AM
From: lorne  Respond to of 224777
 
kenny...Like I told you, biden is a lot smarter than hussein obama...LOL.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145467)10/12/2012 8:24:41 AM
From: JakeStraw4 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224777
 
Paul Ryan handily won last night’s debate

Joe “The Joker” Biden Smirks and Snickers His Way to a Loss
canadafreepress.com

“I don’t believe I’ve ever seen a debate in which one participant was as openly disrespectful of the other as Biden was to Paul Ryan…. It was openly contemptuous and disrespectful.”— Chris Wallace “Fox News”


“Ryan was soft-spoken, sincere, and serious. Biden seemed to take the entire proceeding as a farce. In treating it so, he made it so. More importantly, he made the Obama administration look like what it is: a bullying, bloviating, obnoxious administration more interested in talking over its opponents than working with them to improve the lives of Americans.”— Ben Shapiro “Biden Loses It”

It was clear last night that the time Obama strategist David Axelrod spent prepping Biden for Thursday’s debate was not wasted. Biden obviously took “Chicago Thug” debating techniques to heart: smirking, ridiculing, demeaning, pontificating, gloating, interrupting, lying, over-talking, and just being all-around rude and boorish. “Chicago style” indeed – yeah buddy,

Meanwhile, Paul Ryan calmly, intelligently, and respectfully responded to attacks from what looked to be at times a tag-team consisting of Joe Biden and moderator Martha Radditz. Ben Shapiro notes that Raddatz “did nothing to stop Joe Biden from repeatedly interrupting a very polite Paul Ryan.” After the debate RNC Chair Reince Priebus stated that Biden interrupted Paul Ryan 82 times during last night’s debate.

The liberal media (pardon the redundancy) is making a fuss over how “passionate” Biden was. Yes, well, Hitler was passionate too, and look where that got Germany. I believe that it is safe to say that “we the people” are more interested in facts and truth than passionate posturing these days.

Liberals are notorious for preferring style over substance, so they will no doubt approve of Biden’s boorish behavior, but “we the people” prefer facts over flash, and know beyond the shadow of a doubt that Paul Ryan handily won last night’s debate. Romney/Ryan 2012!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (145467)10/12/2012 1:23:21 PM
From: Ann Corrigan2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224777
 
Seismic shift to Romney since last wk's debate. Vast majority who watched it didn't even tune in last night to watch Biden's creepy Joker impression.