Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (70758)	10/14/2012 5:12:09 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

My horse is not in the race, so I'm voting for the candidate who is the lesser of two evils. I'm afraid that Romney will continue to allow Wall Street's domination of DC. Obama supposedly was going to make some changes in that regard, but after reading Klein's book, The Amateur, it was obvious that not only was he unqualified, but that he was spineless. And that is not going to change, e.g., Corzine 'lost' 1.5 billion and is not being prosecuted? Oh, he was O!'s biggest bundler. I'm normally pro-business and very much a capitalist, but what we have now is utterly lopsided. And neither party can (or will) deal with it. I actually hope Elizabeth Warren wins because she knows what's happening and is willing to stand up and be counted. She's anathema to many in the GOP. Romney comes from a hedge fund, so you know what his viewpoint is. I'm willing to give him a chance because long ago I knew his Mexican cousins. Impressive, upstanding people. Except for that, I might have not voted in this election. Choices are not good. A couple of decades from now, Ron Paul will be seen as a voice in the wilderness, a voice which should have been heeded.